Cited by 155Climate variability and modelsOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Some Overlooked Features of Tropical Atlantic Climate Leading to a New Niño-Like Phenomenon*

Open access
Okumura, Yuko, Xie, Shang-Ping·2006·Journal of Climate

Abstract

Abstract The Atlantic Niño, an equatorial zonal mode akin to the Pacific El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), is phase-locked to boreal summer when the equatorial easterly winds intensify and the thermocline shoals in the Gulf of Guinea. A suite of satellite and in situ observations reveals a new mode of tropical Atlantic variability that displays many characteristics of the zonal mode but instead peaks in November–December (ND). This new mode is found to be statistically independent from both the Atlantic Niño in the preceding summer and the Pacific ENSO. The origin of this ND zonal mode lies in an overlooked aspect of the seasonal cycle in the equatorial Atlantic. In November the equatorial easterly winds intensify for the second time, increasing upwelling and lifting the thermocline in the Gulf of Guinea. An analysis of high-resolution climatological data shows that these dynamical changes induce a noticeable SST cooling in the central equatorial Atlantic. The shoaling thermocline and increased upwelling enhance the SST sensitivity to surface wind changes, reinvigorating equatorial ocean–atmosphere interaction. The resultant ocean–atmospheric anomalies are organized into patterns that give rise to positive mutual feedback as Bjerknes envisioned for the Pacific ENSO. This ND zonal mode significantly affects interannual rainfall variability in coastal Congo–Angola during its early rainy season. It tends to further evolve into a meridional mode in the following March–April, affecting precipitation in northeast Brazil. Thus it offers potential predictability for climate over the Atlantic sector in early boreal winter, a season for which local ocean–atmosphere variability was otherwise poorly understood.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/jcli3928.1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the 20 m surface layer, the model well captures the weakening of the SEC in January-February and September-October.

    “In the 20 m surface layer, the model well captures the weakening of the SEC in January-February and September-October (Okumura and Xie, 2006;Ding et al., 2009;Habasque and Herbert, 2018).”

    From Physical drivers of the nitrate seasonal variability in the Atlantic cold tongue (2020) · cites this paper as Okumura and Xie, 2006

    The Seasonal cycle section describes a substantial semiannual cycle in ocean currents and a second SEC acceleration in November–December, supporting the general point that SEC strength varies seasonally. It does not specify weakening in January–February and September–October. The Data section says the paper analyzes observed surface-current climatology, not whether the citing authors’ model captures currents in a 20 m layer; that model assessment is the citing authors’ own claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The secondary peak in subsurface-surface coupling indicated by the satellite data is consistent with a secondary peak in upwelling in November-December.

    “The secondary peak indicated by the satellite data is consistent with a secondary peak in upwelling in November-December [as discussed by Okumura and Xie (2006)].”

    From Understanding equatorial atlantic interannual variability (2007) · cites this paper as Okumura and Xie (2006)

  • A semiannual component is evident in the relation between surface and subsurface in the Atlantic, particularly in satellite data, consistent with a secondary maximum in equatorial variability seen in satellite-derived SST.

    “A semiannual component is also evident in the relation, particularly in the satellite data, and is consistent with a secondary maximum in equatorial variability seen in satellite-derived SST (Okumura and Xie 2006).”

    From Understanding equatorial atlantic interannual variability (2007) · cites this paper as Okumura and Xie 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Barreiro, M., A. Giannini, P. Chang, and R. Saravanan, 2004: On the role of the South Atlantic atmospheric circulation in tropical Atlantic variability. Earth Climate: The Ocean- Atmosphere Interaction, Geophys. Monogr., Vol. 147, Amer. Geophys. Union, 143-156.
  2. Foltz, G. R., S. A. Grodsky, and J. A. Carton, 2003: Seasonal mixed layer heat budget of the tropical Atlantic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 3146, doi:10.1029/2002JC001584. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Helber, R. W., R. H. Weisberg, F. Bonjean, E. S. Johnson, and G. S. Lagerloef, 2006: Satellite-derived surface current diver- gence in relation to tropical Atlantic SST and wind. J. Phys. Oceanogr., in press.
  4. Huang, B., P. S. Schopf, and Z. Pan, 2002: The ENSO effect on the tropical Atlantic variability: A regionally coupled model study. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 2039, doi:10.1029/ 2002GL014872. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Peter, A.-C., M. Le Hénaff, Y. du Penhoat, C. E. Menkès, F. Marin, J. Vialard, G. Caniaux, and A. Lazar, 2006: A model study of the seasonal mixed layer heat budget in the equato- rial Atlantic. J. Geophys. Res., 111, C06014, doi:10.1029/ 2005JC003157. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Rouault, M., P. Florenchie, N. Fauchereau, and C. J. C. Reason, 2003: South East tropical Atlantic warm events and southern African rainfall. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 8009, doi:10.1029/ 2002GL014840. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Okumura, Y., & Xie, S.-P.
Affiliations
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Venue
Journal of Climate
Published
2006-11-15
Volume
19
Issue
22
Pages
5859-5874
ISSN
  • 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0442
OpenAlex
W2109258972
Cited by
155
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Climate (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory
  • Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
  • NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
Atlantic Niño, thermocline shoaling, sea surface temperature cooling, ocean-atmosphere interaction, interannual rainfall variability, zonal modes, meridional modes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review