A psychodynamic model of panic disorder
Abstract
Current psychiatric research on panic disorder and its treatment are heavily influenced by neurobiological and cognitive-behavioral models rather than psychodynamic propositions, and psychodynamic treatment is generally considered to be of little benefit in amelioration of symptoms. However, because neither of the current models fully explains the clinical psychopathology, etiology, or pathogenesis of panic disorder, there is a need for further model building. The authors suggest that a psychodynamic approach may add to the understanding of patients with panic disorder. They base their psychodynamic formulation on pilot interviews with nine patients with panic disorder, published reports of psychological characteristics of patients with panic disorder, and data from infant and animal research on temperament. Interview results included the following: 1) all of the patients described themselves as fearful, nervous, or shy as children, 2) they remembered their parents as angry, frightening, critical, or controlling, 3) they frequently indicated discomfort with aggression, 4) most described chronic feelings of low self-esteem, 5) their spouses were characterized as passive, kind, and nonaggressive, and 6) stressors associated with frustration and resentment preceded the onset of panic. The authors propose a model in which inborn neurophysiological irritability predisposes to early fearfulness. Exposure to parental behaviors that augment fearfulness results in disturbances in obje…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The PFPP manual was constructed around a psychodynamic formulation of panic disorder that incorporated psychoanalytic theorists and clinicians and information from psychological studies of panic patients, including parental perceptions, premorbid personality traits, and defense mechanisms.
“The formulation incorporated the work of psychoanalytic theorists and clinicians (e.g., Freud 1926; Deutsch 1929), as well as information derived from psychological studies of patients with panic disorder—e.g., parental perceptions, premorbid personality traits, defense mechanisms (Arrindell et al. 1983; Parker 1979; Kleiner and Marshall 1987; Busch et al. 1995).”
From A study demonstrating efficacy of a psychoanalytic psychotherapy for panic disorder: Implications for psychoanalytic research, theory, and practice (2009) · cites this paper as Shear et al. 1993
Cites
A parental bonding instrument.
Parker, G., Tupling, H., & Brown, L. B. (1979) · British Journal of Medical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1979.tb02487.x · Cited by 3,788 · see citing works
Clark, D. M. (1986) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(86)90011-2 · Cited by 2,422 · see citing works
Inventory of interpersonal problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications.
Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureño, G., & Villaseñor, V. S. (1988) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.56.6.885 · Cited by 2,026 · see citing works
Ballenger, J. C. (1988) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800290027004 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Barlow, D. H. (1991) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0201_15 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Busch, F. N., Cooper, A. M., Klerman, G. L., Penzer, R. J., Shapiro, T., & Shear, M. K. (1991) · Psychoanalytic Inquiry · doi:10.1080/07351699109533861 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Busch, F. N., Milrod, B. L., & Sandberg, L. S. (2009) · Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association · doi:10.1177/0003065108329677 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationThe continued usefulness of psychoanalysis in the treatment armamentarium for panic disorder
Milrod, B. (1995) · Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association · doi:10.1177/000306519504300112 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Narcissistic disorder and the failure of symbolisation: A Relational Affective Hypothesis
Mizen, C. S. (2014) · Medical Hypotheses · doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2014.05.012 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shear, M. K., Cooper, A. M., Klerman, G. L., Busch, F., & Shapiro, T.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 1993-06-01
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 859-866
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W1706017187
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- panic disorder, psychodynamic model, parental criticism, object relations, low self-esteem, marital conflict, temperament
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Animals, Defense Mechanisms, Disease Susceptibility, Fantasy, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Psychotherapy, Self Concept, Temperament, Unconscious, Psychology, Parenting, Panic Disorder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review