CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 159Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychological Testing and AssessmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of Self-Injurious Thoughts Using a Behavioral Test

Open access
Nock, Matthew K., Banaji, Mahzarin R.·2007·American Journal of Psychiatry
DOI 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.5.820
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective: The assessment of self-injurious thoughts has been limited by a reliance on what individuals are willing or able to report explicitly. The authors examined a new method that measures self-injurious thoughts by using individuals’ reaction times to self-injury-related stimuli on a computerized test. Method: Eighty-nine adolescents who were not self-injurious (N=36) or had recently engaged in nonsuicidal self-injury (N=53) completed two versions of the Self-Injury Implicit Association Test, which measure the automatic association of self-injury with oneself and with favorableness. Results The tests revealed significant behavioral differences between the self-injurers and noninjurers. Moreover, test scores significantly improved the statistical prediction of nonsuicidal self-injury beyond that achieved with demographic and psychiatric factors. Conclusions: These initial results support the validity of the Self-Injury Implicit Association Test as a performance-based measure of self-injurious thoughts. Future research should further examine the usefulness of incorporating implicit measures in risk assessment and decision-making procedures for self-injury and other sensitive clinical behaviors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.5.820

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 15 references

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wechsler D, 1999, Tex

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–159 of 159

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nock, M. K., & Banaji, M. R.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Nock, Matthew K.
ORCID
Nock, Matthew K.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
Published
2007-05
Volume
164
Issue
5
Pages
820-823
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
DOI
10.1176/ajp.2007.164.5.820
OpenAlex
W2167826805
Cited by
158
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-57672, R03MH076047, R01MH057672, MH076047)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
non-suicidal self-injury, self-injurious thoughts, implicit associations, reaction time, adolescents, automatic associations, risk assessment, performance-based assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Association, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Reaction Time, Self Disclosure, Software, Suicide, Attempted, Thinking, Reproducibility of Results, Self-Injurious Behavior, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review