Cited by 324Cardiac Health and Mental HealthTreatment of Major DepressionAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Effects of antidepressant treatment following myocardial infarction

Open access
van Melle, Joost P., de Jonge, Peter, Honig, Adriaan, Schene, Aart H., Kuyper, Astrid M. G., Crijns, Harry J. G. M., Schins, Annique, Tulner, Dorien +2 more·2007·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Depression following myocardial infarction is associated with poor cardiac prognosis. It is unclear whether antidepressant treatment improves long-term depression status and cardiac prognosis. Aims: To evaluate the effects of antidepressant treatment compared with usual care in an effectiveness study. Method: In a multicentre randomised controlled trial, 2177 myocardial infarction patients were evaluated for ICD–10 depression and randomised to intervention (n=209) or care as usual (n=122). Both arms were evaluated at 18 months post-myocardial infarction for long-term depression status and new cardiac events. Results: No differences were observed between intervention and control groups in mean scores on the Beck Depression Inventory (11.0, s.d.=7.5 v. 10.2, s.d.=5.l, P=0.45) or presence of ICD-10 depression (30.5 v. 32.1%, P=0.68). The cardiac event rate was 14% among the intervention group and 13% among controls (OR=1.07, 95% CI 0.57-2.00). Conclusions: Antidepressant treatment did not alter long-term depression post-myocardial infarction status or improve cardiac prognosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.028647

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a randomized controlled trial, a flexible 6-month depression management intervention offering several medication and nonmedication options in 331 cardiac patients was not associated with lower risk of cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality 8 years later compared with usual care.

    “In a randomized controlled trial, a flexible 6-month depression management intervention offering several medication and nonmedication options in 331 cardiac patients similarly was not associated with lower risk of cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality 8 years later compared with usual care. 193,194”

    From Psychological Health, Well-Being, and the Mind-Heart-Body Connection: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2021) · cites this paper as [194]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most studies showed no significant beneficial effect of treating depression on cardiac endpoints, but a recent RCT revealed fewer depressive symptoms and fewer major adverse cardiac events.

    “Whereas most studies could show no significant beneficial effect, 84,351 -356 a recent RCT revealed fewer depressive symptoms as well as fewer major adverse cardiac events.85”
  • Coronary patients with clinically significant depression can be safely and effectively treated with psychotherapy or SSRIs, but evidence for a beneficial effect on cardiac endpoints is inconclusive.

    “Coronary patients with clinically significant depression can be safely and effectively treated with psychotherapy 84,85,351 -353 or selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, 354 -356 although evidence for a beneficial effect on cardiac endpoints is inconclusive.”
  • A systematic review of 12 RCTs (929 participants) reports no evidence of efficacy for monotherapy with an antidepressant or an antipsychotic, but superior efficacy of their combination over either monotherapy alone or placebo for depression with psychotic features.

    “A systematic review of 12 RCTs (929 participants) reports no evidence of efficacy for monotherapy with an antidepressant or an antipsychotic, but superior efficacy of their combination over either monotherapy alone or placebo. 541”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Melle, J. P., de Jonge, P., Honig, A., Schene, A. H., Kuyper, A. M. G., Crijns, H. J. G. M., Schins, A., Tulner, D., van den Berg, M. P., & Ormel, J.
Affiliations
  • Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital (NL)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2007-06
Volume
190
Issue
6
Pages
460-466
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2151352724
Cited by
324
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 29
FWCI
18.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
antidepressants, myocardial infarction, post-myocardial infarction depression, cardiac prognosis, cardiac events, depression treatment, cardiac rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prognosis, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Risk, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review