Cited by 309Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMigration, Health and Trauma

Do treatment improvements in PTSD severity affect substance use outcomes? A secondary analysis from a randomized clinical trial in NIDA’s Clinical Trials Network

Open access
Hien, Denise A., Jiang, Huiping, Campbell, Aimee N.C., Hu, Mei-Chen, Miele, Gloria M., Cohen, Lisa R., Brigham, Gregory S., Capstick, Carrie +4 more·2010·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the analysis was to examine the temporal course of improvement in symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorder among women in outpatient substance abuse treatment. METHOD: Participants were 353 women randomly assigned to 12 sessions of either trauma-focused or health education group treatment. PTSD and substance use assessments were conducted during treatment and posttreatment at 1 week and after 3, 6, and 12 months. A continuous Markov model was fit on four defined response categories (nonresponse, substance use response, PTSD response, or global response [improvement in both PTSD and substance use]) to investigate the temporal association between improvement in PTSD and substance use symptom severity during the study's treatment phase. A generalized linear model was applied to test this relationship over the follow-up period. RESULTS: Subjects exhibiting nonresponse, substance use response, or global response tended to maintain original classification; subjects exhibiting PTSD response were significantly more likely to transition to global response over time, indicating maintained PTSD improvement was associated with subsequent substance use improvement. Trauma-focused treatment was significantly more effective than health education in achieving substance use improvement, but only among those who were heavy substance users at baseline and had achieved significant PTSD reductions. CONCLUSIONS: PTSD severity reductions were more likely to be associated with substance use improvement, with minimal evidence of substance use symptom reduction improving PTSD symptoms. Results support the self-medication model of coping with PTSD symptoms and an empirical basis for integrated interventions for improved substance use outcomes in patients with severe symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09091261

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]Sobell LC Sobell MB Litten RZ Allen JT Timeline Followback: a technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption, in Measuring alcohol consumption: psychosocial and biological methods 1992 Towota, NJ Humana Press (1992) 41 72

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hien, D. A., Jiang, H., Campbell, A. N. C., Hu, M.-C., Miele, G. M., Cohen, L. R., Brigham, G. S., Capstick, C., Kulaga, A., Robinson, J., Suarez-Morales, L., & Nunes, E. V.
Affiliations
City College of New York (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2010-01-01
Volume
167
Issue
1
Pages
95-101
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2168836182
Cited by
309
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 23
FWCI
19.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (U10DA013720, U10DA013035, U10-DA-13727, K24DA022412, U10DA013046, U10 DA13035, U10DA013732, U10 DA 13714, U10-DA-13038, U10-DA13732, U10DA013714, U10DA013727, U10DA013038)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, substance use disorders, women, health education, self-medication, integrated treatment, outpatient substance abuse treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Change Events, Longitudinal Studies, Markov Chains, Patient Education as Topic, Psychotherapy, Group, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Substance-Related Disorders, National Institute on Drug Abuse (U.S.)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review