Cited by 88Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryNeural dynamics and brain function

Cognitive Abilities and 50- and 100-msec Paired-Click Processes in Schizophrenia

Open access
Smith, Ashley K., Edgar, J. Christopher, Huang, Mingxiong, Lu, Brett Y., Thoma, Robert J., Hanlon, Faith M., McHaffie, Greg, Jones, Aaron P. +3 more·2010·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Abnormal 50- and 100-msec event-related brain activity derived from paired-click procedures are well established in schizophrenia. There is little agreement on whether group differences in the ratio score, i.e., the ratio of EEG amplitude after the second stimulus (S2) to the amplitude after the first stimulus (S1), reflect an encoding or gating abnormality. In addition, the functional implications remain unclear. In the present study, EEG and magnetoencephalography (MEG) were used to examine paired-click measures and cognitive correlates of paired-click activity. METHOD: EEG and whole-cortex MEG data were acquired during the standard paired-click paradigm in 73 comparison subjects and 79 schizophrenia patients. Paired-click ratio scores were obtained at 50 msec (P50 evoked potential at Cz, M50 at left and right superior temporal gyrus [STG]) and 100 msec (N100 at Cz, M100 at left and right STG). A cognitive battery assessing attention, working memory, and long-delay memory was administered. IQ was also estimated. RESULTS: Groups differed on ratio score and amplitude of S1 response. Ratio scores at 50 msec and 100 msec and S1 amplitude predicted variance in attention (primarily S1 amplitude), working memory, and long-delay memory. The attention findings remained after removal of variance associated with IQ. CONCLUSIONS: Associations between paired-click measures and cognitive performance in patients support 50-msec and 100-msec ratio and amplitude scores as clinically significant biomarkers of schizophrenia. In general, cognitive performance was better predicted by the ability to encode auditory information than the ability to filter redundant information.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09071059

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • P50 inhibitory gating deficits in schizophrenia have been associated with the frequency and intensity of auditory hallucinations and with neurocognitive measures of decreased vigilance and attention.

    “P50 inhibitory gating deficits in schizophrenia have been associated with the frequency and intensity of auditory hallucinations and with neurocognitive measures of decreased vigilance and attention, consistent with the role of inhibitory sensory gating in protecting the brain from being responsive to extraneous stimuli while it is trying to focus attention on a task (16, 17).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Adler LE, 1982, Biol Psychiatry, 17, 639
  2. Miller GA, 1991, Psychophysiology, 5, 273
  3. Heaton RK: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test—64-Card Version, Research Edition Version 3.1.0.8. Lutz, Fla, Psychological Assessment Resources, 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, A. K., Edgar, J. C., Huang, M., Lu, B. Y., Thoma, R. J., Hanlon, F. M., McHaffie, G., Jones, A. P., Paz, R. D., Miller, G. A., & Cañive, J. M.
Affiliations
Mind Research Network (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2010-10
Volume
167
Issue
10
Pages
1264-1275
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2119369829
Cited by
88
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Stanley Medical Research Institute
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH-61358, R01MH065304, R01 MH 061358, T32 MH-19554, T32 MH019554, R01 MH-65304)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
schizophrenia, paired-click paradigm, P50, N1 component, M50, M100, auditory event-related potentials, auditory gating, auditory coding, attention, working memory, IQ, biomarkers, superior temporal gyrus, cognitive performance
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Attention, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Schizophrenia, Temporal Lobe, Magnetoencephalography, Sensory Gating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review