Cited by 342Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain functionHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

P50, N100, and P200 sensory gating: Relationships with behavioral inhibition, attention, and working memory

Open access
Lijffijt, Marijn, Lane, Scott D., Meier, Stacey L., Boutros, Nash N., Burroughs, Scott, Steinberg, Joel L., Gerard Moeller, F., Swann, Alan C.·2009·Psychophysiology

Abstract

P50, N100, and P200 auditory sensory gating could reflect mechanisms involved in protecting higher‐order cognitive functions, suggesting relationships between sensory gating and cognition. This hypothesis was tested in 56 healthy adults who were administered the paired‐click paradigm and two adaptations of the continuous performance test (Immediate/Delayed Memory Task, IMT/DMT). Stronger P50 gating correlated with fewer commission errors and prolonged reaction times on the DMT. Stronger N100 and P200 gating correlated with better discriminability on the DMT. Finally, prolonged P200 latency related to better discriminability on the IMT. These findings suggest that P50, N100, and P200 gating could be involved in protecting cognition by affecting response bias, behavioral inhibition, working memory, or attention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00845.x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JB Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders—patient edition 1996 New York Biometrics Research Institute, New York State Psychiatric Institute

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lijffijt, M., Lane, S. D., Meier, S. L., Boutros, N. N., Burroughs, S., Steinberg, J. L., Gerard Moeller, F., & Swann, A. C.
Affiliations
Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lijffijt, Marijn
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
1059-1068
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2054450240
Cited by
341
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da008425-08)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH69944, R01MH058784, R01-MH58784, R01MH069944)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K02DA000403, R01 DA-08425, K02DA00403, R01-DA-008425)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024148)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Keywords
auditory gating, P50, N1 component, P200, behavioral inhibition, attention, working memory, paired-click paradigm, continuous performance test, commission errors, response bias, reaction time, discriminability
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Behavior, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Psychomotor Performance, Sensory Gating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review