Cited by 87Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and Access

Examining the Reach of Smartphone Apps for Depression and Anxiety

Wasil, Akash R., Gillespie, Sarah, Shingleton, Rebecca, Wilks, Chelsey R., Weisz, John R.·2020·American Journal of Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19090905

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wasil, A. R., Gillespie, S., Shingleton, R., Wilks, C. R., & Weisz, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2020-05-01
Volume
177
Issue
5
Pages
464-465
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W3022335366
Cited by
87
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4
FWCI
12.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
mobile application, depression, anxiety, digital mental health interventions, mental health technology
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Anxiety, Depression, Humans, Psychotherapy, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review