Cited by 89Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeurological disorders and treatments

Comparison of anticraving efficacy of right and left repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in alcohol dependence: a randomized double-blind study

Open access
Mishra, Biswa Ranjan, Praharaj, Samir Kumar, Katshu, Mohammad Zia Ul Haq, Sarkar, Sukanto, Nizamie, S. Haque·2015·The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the anticraving efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the right versus left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in patients with alcohol dependence. Twenty patients with alcohol dependence syndrome were randomly allocated to receive either right or left rTMS over the right DLPFC (10 sessions at 10 Hz frequency; 20 trains per session; 4.9 seconds per train and intertrain interval 30 seconds) and were assessed on the Alcohol Craving Questionnaire (ACQ-NOW) to measure craving. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance for ACQ-NOW total score showed no main effect of group (F[1,18] = 0.0001 but significant main effect of time (F[1,18] = 185.91, p<0.0001, η(2) = 0.912). The interaction effect between group and time was not significant. There was significant reduction in craving scores in patients receiving either right or left rTMS with large effect size. However, there was no difference in anticraving efficacy between the two groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13010013

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mishra, B. R., Praharaj, S. K., Katshu, M. Z. U. H., Sarkar, S., & Nizamie, S. H.
Affiliations
Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute (IN)
Venue
The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Published
2015-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
e54-e59
ISSN
  • 0895-0172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7222
OpenAlex
W2154108980
Cited by
89
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Neuropsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
alcoholism, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, alcohol craving, craving reduction, high-frequency rTMS, hemispheric lateralization
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Analysis of Variance, Double-Blind Method, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Prefrontal Cortex, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review