Cited by 174Schizophrenia research and treatmentDisability Education and EmploymentMental Health and Patient Involvement

Self-Esteem as an Outcome Measure in Studies of Vocational Rehabilitation for Adults With Severe Mental Illness

Torrey, William C., Mueser, Kim T., McHugo, Gregory H., Drake, Robert E.·2000·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Self-esteem is widely used as an outcome variable in studies of psychiatric rehabilitation, based on the assumption that improved functional status leads to higher self-esteem. Little is known, however, about the determinants of self-esteem among adults with severe mental illness. The utility of a popular measure of global self-esteem-the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale-as an outcome measure was examined in this population. METHODS: A total of 143 participants enrolled in a study of vocational rehabilitation were assessed at baseline and six, 12, and 18 months later using measures of self-esteem, symptoms, life satisfaction, work status, housing status, and total income. RESULTS: Scores on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale did not vary with work status or other functional outcomes but instead were strongly related to measures of life satisfaction and affective symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that working leads to improved self-esteem for people with severe mental illness was not supported. For this population, self-esteem, as measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, appears to be a relatively stable trait that reflects general life satisfaction and affective symptoms rather than objective functional status.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.51.2.229

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Torrey, W. C., Mueser, K. T., McHugo, G. H., & Drake, R. E.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2000-02
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
229-233
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2155858292
Cited by
174
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k02mh000839-10, 5r18mh047650-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-00839, MH-47650)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
self-esteem, vocational rehabilitation, severe mental illness, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, outcome measures, life satisfaction, affective symptoms, employment, functional status, psychiatric rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review