Cited by 37Occupational Therapy Practice and ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and Validation

Psychometric properties and factor structure of the 13-item satisfaction with daily occupations scale when used with people with mental health problems

Open access
Eklund, Mona, Bäckström, Martin, Eakman, Aaron M·2014·Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In mental health care practice and research it is increasingly recognized that clients' subjective perceptions of everyday occupations, such as satisfaction, are important in recovery from mental illness. Instruments thus need to be developed to assess satisfaction with everyday occupations. The aim of the present study was to assess psychometric properties of the 13-item Satisfaction with Daily Occupation (SDO-13) when used with people with mental health problems, including its internal consistency, factor structure, construct validity and whether the scale produced ceiling or floor effects. An additional question concerned if the factor structure varied whether the participants were, or were not, presently engaged in the activity they rated. METHODS: The interview-based SDO-13 includes items pertaining to work/studies, leisure, home maintenance, and self-care occupations. Whether the person currently performs an occupation or not, he/she is asked to indicate his/her satisfaction with that occupation. The SDO-13 was completed with 184 persons with mental illness. Residual variables were created to remove the variation linked with currently performing the targeted occupation or not and to assess the factor structure of the SDO-13. The indicators of general satisfaction with daily occupations, self-esteem and global functioning were used to assess construct validity. The statistical methods included tests of homogeneity, confirmatory factor analysis and Pearson correlations. RESULTS: The internal consistency was satisfactory at 0.79. A three-factor solution indicated that the construct behind the SDO-13 was composed of three facets; Taking care of oneself and the home, Work and studies, and Leisure and relaxation. The same factor structure was valid for both original scores and the residuals. An expected pattern of correlations with the indicators was mainly found, suggesting basic construct validity. No ceiling or floor effects were found. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, the findings suggest the SDO-13 is a reliable and robust instrument that may be used to get an overview of the satisfaction people living with mental illness derive from their daily occupations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12955-014-0191-3

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [8]McClelland DC Human Motivation 1987 New York Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge
  2. [20]Law M Babtiste S Carswell A McColl MA Polatajko H Pollock N Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (3rd edition) 1998 Toronto CAOT Publications

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eklund, M., Bäckström, M., & Eakman, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Eklund, Mona
Venue
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published
2014-12
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
191-191
ISSN
1477-7525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146993660
Cited by
37
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
12.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health and Quality of Life Outcomes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet (521-2011-561)
  • Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
daily occupations, job satisfaction, mental illness, psychometric properties, factor structure, construct validity, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, self-care, work and study, leisure and relaxation, self-esteem, global functioning
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Education, Employment, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Leisure Activities, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Occupational Therapy, Personal Satisfaction, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Self Care, Work, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review