Cited by 133Cancer survivorship and carePsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsWomen's cancer prevention and management

Diagnostic criteria for psychosomatic research and psychosocial variables in breast cancer patients

Grassi, Luigi, Rossi, Elena, Sabato, Silvana, Cruciani, Giorgio, Zambelli, Maurizio·2004·Psychosomatics

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine the relationship of the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR) with psychosocial variables and quality of life among cancer patients. Of 105 women with breast cancer who participated in the study, 40 (38.1%) had symptoms meeting the criteria for at least one DCPR syndrome, and 30 (28.6%) had more than one DCPR syndrome. Health anxiety, demoralization, and alexithymia were the most frequent DCPR syndromes. Patients who were diagnosed with DCPR syndromes reported higher levels of cancer-related worries and poorer quality of life than those without a DCPR diagnosis. Analysis of the single DCPR clusters and coping with cancer indicated that health anxiety was related to higher scores on the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini-MAC) anxious preoccupation subscale, DCPR demoralization was related to higher scores on the Mini-MAC hopelessness subscale, and DCPR alexithymia was related to higher scores on the Mini-MAC avoidance subscale. The study indicates the usefulness of the application of the DCPR in breast cancer, although further research is needed to improve the feasibility and internal validity of DCPR constructs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.psy.45.6.483

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grassi, L., Rossi, E., Sabato, S., Cruciani, G., & Zambelli, M.
Affiliations
University of Ferrara (IT)
Corresponding author
Grassi, Luigi
Venue
Psychosomatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
483-491
ISSN
0033-3182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973975800
Cited by
133
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
breast cancer, psychosocial factors, quality of life, health anxiety, demoralization, alexithymia, cancer-related worry, coping with cancer, anxious preoccupation, hopelessness, avoidance
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Breast Neoplasms, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Psychology, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research, Risk Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Prevalence, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review