The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anxiety Affects Cognition Differently in Healthy Apolipoprotein E ε4 Homozygotes and Non-Carriers
Abstract
It is not known whether apolipoprotein E ε4-an Alzheimer disease susceptibility gene-influences the effects of state-anxiety on executive functioning in healthy individuals. In a prospective cohort study of 185 cognitively normal individuals, there were ε4 homozygotes, heterozygotes, and non-carriers, who did not differ in age, sex, years of education, cognitive test scores, psychotropic medications, and state- or trait-anxiety. However, higher anxiety was associated with significantly worse Trails B performance in the ε4 homozygotes, as compared with ε4 non-carriers. The association of executive-functioning difficulties and anxiety appears more likely to occur in persons who are most at risk for subsequent cognitive decline.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anxiety is inversely related to cognitive function, particularly in E4 homozygotes.
“anxiety is inversely related to cognitive function (Porter et al., 2003), particularly in E4 homozygotes (Stonnington et al., 2011)”
From Apolipoprotein E–low density lipoprotein receptor interaction affects spatial memory retention and brain ApoE levels in an isoform-dependent manner (2014) · cites this paper as Stonnington et al., 2011
Citations
Cites
Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336 · Cited by 5,289
Reiman, E. M., Caselli, R. J., Yun, L. S., Chen, K., Bandy, D., Minoshima, S., Thibodeau, S. N., & Osborne, D. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199603213341202 · Cited by 1,366
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Lezak MD , Howieson DB , Loring DW , et al.: Neuropsychological Assessment, 4th Edition. New York, Oxford University Press, 2004
- 10.1080/13825580600678442 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00071-4 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.272 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1355617701755105 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.55.12.1847 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/122.3.383 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00415-006-0488-1 · DOI
- 10.1080/13803390490919001 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00132-X · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.43.8.1467 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1155/2007/91236 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.06.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1176/jnp.2009.21.2.199 · DOI
- 10.1176/jnp.16.3.320 · DOI
- Spielberger CD , Gorsuch RL , Lushene R , et al.: Manual for the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA, Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc, 1983
- 10.1212/01.WNL.0000129533.26544.BF · DOI
- Hixson JE, 1990, J Lipid Res, 31, 545, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)43176-1 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Johnson, L. A., Olsen, R. H. J., Merkens, L. S., DeBarber, A., Steiner, R. D., Sullivan, P. M., Maeda, N., & Raber, J. (2014) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2013.12.016 · Cited by 107
Cognitive debt and Alzheimer’s disease
Marchant, N. L., & Howard, R. J. (2015) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-141515 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Stonnington, C. M., Locke, D. E. C., Dueck, A. C., & Caselli, R. J.
- Affiliations
- From the Dept. of Psychiatry and Psychology, Section of Biostatistics, and Dept of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Arizona.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 294-299
- ISSN
- 0895-0172
- 1545-7222
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
