Cited by 70Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Personality and Clinical Predictors of Recurrence of Depression

Berlanga, Carlos, Heinze, Gerardo, Torres, Marina, Apiquián, Rogelio, Caballero, Alejandro·1999·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To help clinicians more accurately predict outcomes of treatment for depression, variables associated with recurrence of depression in the year after treatment were examined in a group of patients who completed treatment for an index episode of depression. METHODS: Forty-two depressed patients who participated in a double-blind pharmacological treatment study were followed for one year after treatment was discontinued. Length of treatment for the index episode was determined by clinicians and ranged from eight to 76 consecutive weeks. Eighteen patients who had a recurrent episode (43 percent) and 24 patients who did not (57 percent) were compared on sociodemographic and clinical variables, including scores on the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ). RESULTS: A combination of three variables predicted recurrence of depression in 90 percent of cases. They were an elevated EPQ score on the neuroticism subscale, a short duration of treatment of the index episode, and a slow onset of response to treatment of the index episode. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that personality traits, treatment duration, and variations in response to treatment might have an impact on long-term treatment outcome. Clinicians should consider these factors when making treatment decisions for depressed patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ps.50.3.376

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Number of previous episodes, residual symptoms, and other factors robustly increase the risk of relapse independent of medication discontinuation.

    “Many of the factors reported on here appear to have robust properties as predictors of relapse or recurrence risk independent of medication discontinuation: number of previous episodes (Berlanga et al. 1999; Kendler et al. 2000; Burcusa & Iacono, 2007; Hardeveld et al. 2010), residual symptoms (Hardeveld et al. 2010; Nierenberg et al. 2010) and other factors all robustly increase the risk of rela”

    From Predicting relapse after antidepressant withdrawal – a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as Berlanga et al. 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berlanga, C., Heinze, G., Torres, M., Apiquián, R., & Caballero, A.
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
1999-03
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
376-380
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2171344924
Cited by
70
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
depression recurrence, personality traits, neuroticism, treatment duration, treatment response, antidepressant treatment outcome, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review