Cited by 367War, Law, and JusticeMemory, violence, and historySouth African History and Culture

Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation?

Open access
Gibson, James L.·2006·The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Abstract

Throughout the world, truth commissions are being constructed under the hope that discovering the “truth” about a country's conflictual past will somehow contribute to “reconciliation.” Most such efforts point to South Africa's process as an exemplar of the powerful influence of truth finding. But has truth actually contributed to reconciliation in South Africa? No rigorous and systematic assessment of the truth and reconciliation process has ever been conducted. This article investigates the hypothesis that truth leads to reconciliation. Based on a survey of thirty-seven hundred South Africans in 2001, the author begins by giving both “truth” and “reconciliation” clear conceptual and operational meaning. The author reports empirical evidence that the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's “truth” is fairly widely accepted by South Africans of all races, that some degree of reconciliation characterizes South Africa today, and that the collective memory produced by the process (“truth”) did indeed contribute to reconciliation. The author then considers whether other divided countries might be able to use a similar process to propel themselves toward a more peaceful and democratic future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0002716205282895

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Truth commissions abound in South America (Paraguay, Ecuador, Peru) and Africa (Kenya, South Africa, Liberia), and can also be found in Indonesia and East Germany.

    “Truth commissions abound in South America (Paraguay, Ecuador, Peru) and Africa (Kenya, South Africa and Liberia); they can also be found in Indonesia and East Germany (United States Institute of Peace 2011a, 2011b, 2011c, 2011d, 2011e, 2011f, 2011h, 2011i; Gibson 2006).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gibson, J. L.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Gibson, James L.
Venue
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Published
2006-01
Volume
603
Issue
1
Pages
82-110
ISSN
  • 0002-7162 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3349
OpenAlex
W2155405090
Cited by
367
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 27
FWCI
110.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (publishedVersion)
  • The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University) (submittedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › War, Law, and Justice
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Memory, violence, and history
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › South African History and Culture
Keywords
truth commissions, truth and reconciliation, reconciliation, South Africa, apartheid, collective memory, truth-finding, post-conflict societies, democratic transition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review