Cited by 52International Business and FDIPolitical Conflict and GovernancePeacebuilding and International Security

The economic benefits of justice

Appel, Benjamin J, Loyle, Cyanne E·2012·Journal of Peace Research

Abstract

Post-conflict states represent an important research agenda for scholars studying foreign direct investment (FDI). While leaders of post-conflict states have strong incentives for trying to attract international investments, multinational corporations (MNCs) may view these states as high-risk since the reoccurrence of violence in the aftermath of civil conflict is common. Consequently, leaders of post-conflict states desperate to receive FDI to help ignite their stalled economies must convince MNCs that their state is a stable and secure place to invest in. Drawing on the recent literature that identifies the importance of domestic and international institutions for securing FDI, this article argues that post-conflict justice (PCJ) institutions can help post-conflict states attract investment. The domestic and reputation costs associated with implementing PCJ allow states to send a costly and credible signal to international investors about the state’s willingness to pursue the successful reconstruction of the post-conflict zone. Under these conditions, uncertainty is lessened and foreign investors can feel more confident about making investments. Post-conflict states, therefore, that choose to implement PCJ are more likely to receive higher levels of FDI compared with post-conflict states that refrain from implementing these institutions. Statistical tests confirm the relationship between justice institutions and FDI from 1970–2001. Post-conflict states that implement restor…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022343312450044

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The costly and public nature of truth commissions sends a credible signal to potential rebels and their supporters that the government is committed to addressing grievances and promoting peace and societal reconciliation.

    “Furthermore, the costly and public nature of truth commissions sends a credible signal to potential rebels and their supporters that the government is committed to addressing grievances and promoting peace and societal reconciliation (Appel and Loyle 2012;Taylor and Dulkalskis 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Appel, B. J., & Loyle, C. E.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • West Virginia University (US)
Corresponding author
Loyle, Cyanne E
Venue
Journal of Peace Research
Published
2012-09-01
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
685-699
ISSN
  • 0022-3433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3578
OpenAlex
W2325275831
Cited by
52
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Peace Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Telekom Malaysia Berhad
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
Keywords
post-conflict justice, foreign direct investment, restorative justice, post-conflict reconstruction, investment climate, institutional credibility, post-conflict states, civil conflict, investor uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review