From Supervision to Opportunity: Reimagining Probation and Parole
Open accessAbstract
Across a variety of measures of safety and rehabilitation, our current systems of parole and probation are failing. Research shows that community supervision fails to reduce crime; traps its subjects in cycles of criminal justice involvement; is excessively punitive; and creates widespread harm to individuals, families, and communities—all while failing to significantly contribute to the social and economic integration of those under its control. We argue for a wholesale reform of community supervision, including the abandonment of current monitoring and control functions, and the repurposing of resources into systems of support for the hundreds of thousands of people leaving prison and jail every year. We also provide an overview to the articles assembled for this volume, which chart the challenges facing those on community supervision and offer a roadmap of potential policy solutions for improving the life chances of formerly incarcerated and justice-involved people.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both probation and parole facilitate cyclical incarceration, with people often sentenced to prison for violating supervision conditions rather than new crimes.
“Both probation and parole facil-itate cyclical incarceration, with people often being sentenced to prison for violating the conditions of their community supervision, as opposed to being convicted of a new crime (Harding et al. 2022).”
From The Rise of the Carceral State: Foundations and Contours of a Rapidly Changing Criminal Legal System (2025) · cites this paper as Harding et al. 2022
Cites
Alexander, M. (2020) · Power and Inequality · doi:10.4324/9781315201511-37 · Cited by 3,760
The culture of control: crime and social order in contemporary, society
de Souza, L. A. D. (2003) · doi:10.1590/s0104-44782003000100015 · Cited by 2,955 · cited 1×
“Reimagining community Supervision consistent with the criminal justice system’s larger focus on punishment (Feeley and Simon 1992; Simon 1993; garland 2001; Western 2006), the current system tABLe 3 Poverty Rate by Community Supervision and Sex and Race, Individuals Ages 18 to 64 in 2017 to 2019…”
MethodCrime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life
SAMPSON, R. J., & LAUB, J. H. (1993) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0011128793039003010 · Cited by 2,793 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For example, stable, full-time employment in well-paying jobs promotes desistance from crime (Sampson and Laub 1993; Ramakers et al.”
BackgroundThe New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications
Feeley, M., & Simon, J. (1992) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.x · Cited by 2,109 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Reimagining community Supervision consistent with the criminal justice system’s larger focus on punishment (Feeley and Simon 1992; Simon 1993; garland 2001; Western 2006), the current system tABLe 3 Poverty Rate by Community Supervision and Sex and Race, Individuals Ages 18 to 64 in 2017 to 2019…”
MethodTransitions from Prison to Community: Understanding Individual Pathways
Visher, C. A., & Travis, J. (2003) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.095931 · Cited by 908 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Research documents the low rates of employment, housing stability, health care access, and myriad other indicators of social and economic reintegration among people on supervision (visher and travis 2003; Western et al.”
BackgroundHawick, L., Thomson, A., & Cleland, J. (2019) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13800 · Cited by 832 · cited 1×
“Reimagining community Supervision consistent with the criminal justice system’s larger focus on punishment (Feeley and Simon 1992; Simon 1993; garland 2001; Western 2006), the current system tABLe 3 Poverty Rate by Community Supervision and Sex and Race, Individuals Ages 18 to 64 in 2017 to 2019…”
MethodImprisoning Communities: How Mass Incarceration Makes Disadvantaged Neighborhoods Worse
Tita, G. (2009) · doi:10.1177/009430610903800221 · Cited by 685 · cited 1×
“For example, communities with high incarceration rates are less able to reduce crime through informal social control because incarceration cycling disrupts social networks (clear 2007).”
BackgroundDobbie, W., Goldin, J., & Yang, C. S. (2018) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20161503 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Stress and Hardship after Prison
Western, B., Braga, A. A., Davis, J., & Sirois, C. (2015) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/681301 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Self-citationIntensive Probation and Parole
Petersilia, J. R., & Turner, S. F. (1993) · Crime and justice · doi:10.1086/449215 · Cited by 383 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Similar results exist for intensive parole (Petersilia and turner 1993). the failure of intensive supervision shows how systems based on monitoring and surveillance will only perpetuate punishment.”
ResultDrawing Blood from Stones: Legal Debt and Social Inequality in the Contemporary United States
Harris, A., Evans, H., & Beckett, K. (2010) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/651940 · Cited by 375 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, the costs of such fines and fees can disrupt reintegration and desistance from crime (Harris, evans, and Beckett 2010; DeMarco, Dwuer, and Haynie 2021).”
BackgroundPoor discipline : parole and the social control of the underclass, 1890-1990
Simon, J. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2076893 · Cited by 311 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Reimagining community Supervision consistent with the criminal justice system’s larger focus on punishment (Feeley and Simon 1992; Simon 1993; garland 2001; Western 2006), the current system tABLe 3 Poverty Rate by Community Supervision and Sex and Race, Individuals Ages 18 to 64 in 2017 to 2019…”
MethodThe Paradox of Probation: Community Supervision in the Age of Mass Incarceration
Phelps, M. S. (2013) · Law & Policy · doi:10.1111/lapo.12002 · Cited by 260 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Scholars and policymakers use the term “net widening” for criminal justice processes that escalate involvement (Austin and Krisberg 1981; McMahan 1990; tonry and Lynch 1996; Phelps 2013).”
BackgroundSeiler, L., & Booth, A. C. (2016) · doi:10.1353/ner.2016.0073 · Cited by 250 · cited 2×
“2015; Western 2018; Harding et al.”
BackgroundCumulative Disadvantage in the American Criminal Justice System
Kurlychek, M., & Johnson, B. (2019) · annual review of criminology · doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024815 · Cited by 226 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Yet a conviction creates or adds to one’s criminal record, leading to harsher sentences in the future (Kurlychek and Johnson 2019).”
BackgroundHalfway Home: Race, Punishment, and the Afterlife of Mass Incarceration
Shefner, R. T. (2021) · Ethics and Social Welfare · doi:10.1080/17496535.2021.1961363 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Harding, D. J., Wyse, J. J. B., Dobson, C. C., & Morenoff, J. D. (2014) · Journal of policy analysis and management · doi:10.1002/pam.21741 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Self-citationGaes, G., Flanagan, T., Motiuk, L., & Stewart, L. (1999) · Crime and justice · doi:10.1086/449300 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Harding, D. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Herbert, C. (2013) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716213477070 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Self-citationShared Beginnings, Divergent Lives
Toby, J. (2005) · doi:10.1177/009430610503400144 · Cited by 172
Johnson, R. C., & Raphael, S. (2009) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/597102 · Cited by 171 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Incarceration cycling also increases the transmission of infectious diseases between prisons and jails and communities (Johnson and Raphael 2009).”
BackgroundBozick, R. N., Steele, J., Davis, L. M., & Turner, S. F. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-018-9334-6 · Cited by 163 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Improving opportunities also makes communities safer: education, stable jobs, housing security, and good health all reduce crime (e.g., Sampson and Laub 2003; Bozick et al. 2018; Kirk et al. 2018; Link et al. 2019).”
BackgroundA Decade of Experimenting with Intermediate Sanctions: What Have We Learned?
Petersilia, J. R. (1999) · doi:10.3818/jrp.1.1.1999.9 · Cited by 161
Austin, J., & Krisberg, B. A. (1981) · doi:10.1177/002242788101800110 · Cited by 154 · cited 1×
“Scholars and policymakers use the term “net widening” for criminal justice processes that escalate involvement (Austin and Krisberg 1981; McMahan 1990; tonry and Lynch 1996; Phelps 2013).”
BackgroundLink, N. W., Ward, J. T., & Stansfield, R. (2019) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12213 · Cited by 144 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Improving opportunities also makes communities safer: education, stable jobs, housing security, and good health all reduce crime (e.g., Sampson and Laub 2003; Bozick et al. 2018; Kirk et al. 2018; Link et al. 2019).”
BackgroundParole, Desistance from Crime, and Community Integration
Rosenfeld, R. (2008) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/11988 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Understanding Prison Policy and Population Trends
Caplow, T., & Simon, J. S. (1999) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/449295 · Cited by 138 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…with more stringent conditions than traditional probation (Palumbo, clifford, and Snyder-Joy 1992; Petersilia 1999), it ended up increasing the incidence of technical violations and incarceration compared to routine supervision (caplow and Simon 1999; Lin 2010; Lin, grattet, and Petersilia 2010).”
BackgroundLIN, J., GRATTET, R., & PETERSILIA, J. (2010) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00201.x · Cited by 127 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…with more stringent conditions than traditional probation (Palumbo, clifford, and Snyder-Joy 1992; Petersilia 1999), it ended up increasing the incidence of technical violations and incarceration compared to routine supervision (caplow and Simon 1999; Lin 2010; Lin, grattet, and Petersilia 2010).”
BackgroundNot Just Any Job Will Do: A Study on Employment Characteristics and Recidivism Risks After Release
Ramakers, A., Nieuwbeerta, P., van Wilsem, J., & Dirkzwager, A. (2016) · International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology · doi:10.1177/0306624x16636141 · Cited by 92 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, stable, full-time employment in well-paying jobs promotes desistance from crime (Sampson and Laub 1993; Ramakers et al. 2017; LaBriola 2020), but the low-wage work often mandated by parole requirements does not (Seim and Harding 2020).”
BackgroundTonry, M., & Lynch, M. (1996) · Crime and justice · doi:10.1086/449242 · Cited by 89 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Scholars and policymakers use the term “net widening” for criminal justice processes that escalate involvement (Austin and Krisberg 1981; McMahan 1990; tonry and Lynch 1996; Phelps 2013).”
BackgroundGoverning Marginality: Coercion and Care in Probation
Phelps, M., & Ruhland, E. L. (2021) · Social problems · doi:10.1093/socpro/spaa060 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Redcross, C., Millenky, M., Rudd, T., & Levshin, V. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2010208 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Waller, I. (1974) · doi:10.1016/0047-2352(74)90029-4 · Cited by 82 · cited 1×
“However, some older analyses find similar recidivism rates among parolees and others who leave prison without supervision, controlling for demographic characteristics and criminal history (Waller 1974; gottfredson et al.”
BackgroundHarding, D. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Wyse, J. J. B. (2019) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226607788.001.0001 · Cited by 80 · cited 1× · see citing works
“2017; Harding, Morenoff, and Wyse 2019).”
Self-citationWork as Foraging: A Smartphone Study of Job Search and Employment after Prison1
Sugie, N. F. (2018) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/696209 · Cited by 79 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…search and family reunification upon release. criminal behavior often results either from barriers to reintegration that cause poverty and housing insecurity or from relapses to addiction or mental illness that are themselves typically rooted in a life history of trauma (Sugie 2018; Western et al.”
BackgroundShort- and long-term effects of imprisonment on future felony convictions and prison admissions
Harding, D. J., Morenoff, J. D., Nguyen, A. P., & Bushway, S. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.1701544114 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citation‘NET-WIDENING’ Vagaries in the Use of a Concept
Mcmahon, M. (1990) · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a047986 · Cited by 71
The Financial Cost of a Criminal Conviction: Context and Consequences
Pleggenkuhle, B. (2018) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854817734278 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Harding, D. J., Dobson, C. C., Wyse, J. J. B., & Morenoff, J. D. (2016) · American Journal of Cultural Sociology · doi:10.1057/s41290-016-0004-8 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationCriminal Justice Debt During the Prisoner Reintegration Process: Who Has It and How Much?
Link, N. W. (2019) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854818790291 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Ostermann, M., Salerno, L. M., & Hyatt, J. (2015) · Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0022427815580626 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
More Work to Do: Analysis of Probation and Parole in the United States, 2017-2018
Bradner, K., Schiraldi, V. N., Mejia, N., & Lopoo, E. (2020) · doi:10.7916/d8-hjyq-fg65 · Cited by 51
Another Look At the Effectiveness of Parole Supervision
Gottfredson, M. R., Mitchel-Herzfeld, S. D., & Flanagan, T. (1982) · doi:10.1177/002242788201900209 · Cited by 45
A natural experiment study of the effects of imprisonment on violence in the community
Harding, D. J., Morenoff, J. D., Nguyen, A. P., Bushway, S., & Binswanger, I. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0604-8 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationParolefare: Post-prison Supervision and Low-Wage Work
Seim, J., & Harding, D. J. (2020) · RSF · doi:10.7758/rsf.2020.6.1.08 · Cited by 37 · cited 1×
“2017; LaBriola 2020), but the low-wage work often mandated by parole requirements does not (Seim and Harding 2020).”
BackgroundSelf-citationKirk, D. S., Barnes, G. C., Hyatt, J. M., & Kearley, B. W. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-017-9317-z · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Does Welfare Prevent Crime? The Criminal Justice Outcomes of Youth Removed from SSI
Deshpande, M., & Mueller-Smith, M. (2022) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4041096 · Cited by 28
DeMarco, L. M., Dwyer, R. E., & Haynie, D. (2021) · Criminology (Beverly Hills) · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12286 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
SOME EFFECTS OF PAROLE SUPERVISION ON RECIDIVISM
Jackson, P. (1983) · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a047336 · Cited by 25 · cited 1×
“…no supervision (65.2 percent) than among parolees (50.7 percent) (Osterman, Saleron, and Hyatt 2015), this gap shrank when parole revocation was included in the definition of recidivism and disappeared entirely when controlling for demographics, offense, and a risk score (see also Jackson 1983).”
BackgroundInfluentialParole Revocation in the Era of Mass Incarceration
Lin, J. (2010) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00335.x · Cited by 24 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…with more stringent conditions than traditional probation (Palumbo, clifford, and Snyder-Joy 1992; Petersilia 1999), it ended up increasing the incidence of technical violations and incarceration compared to routine supervision (caplow and Simon 1999; Lin 2010; Lin, grattet, and Petersilia 2010).”
BackgroundAlfonso, P. (2017) · doi:10.1057/9781137294609.0008 · Cited by 22 · cited 1×
“2019; Jones 2018; Miller 2020).”
Custodial Parole Sanctions and Earnings after Release from Prison
Harding, D. J., Siegel, J., & Morenoff, J. D. (2017) · Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation · doi:10.1093/sf/sox047 · Cited by 22 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Periods of incarceration for violations of supervision can also lower earnings and harm employment prospects (Harding, Siegel, and Morenoff 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPost-prison Employment Quality and Future Criminal Justice Contact
LaBriola, J. (2020) · RSF · doi:10.7758/rsf.2020.6.1.07 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Short-timing: The carceral experience of soon-to-be-released prisoners
Seim, J. (2016) · doi:10.1177/1462474516641377 · Cited by 21 · cited 1×
“Yet research documents the positive intentions of returning citizens; the vast majority of formerly incarcerated people desire “conventional” roles as workers, family members, students, and community members (Seim 2016; Western 2018; Harding, Dobson, et al.”
BackgroundSugie, N. F. (2020) · doi:10.1177/1462474520904992 · Cited by 20
The consequences of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act for police arrests
Simes, J. T., & Jahn, J. L. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261512 · Cited by 17 · cited 1× · see citing works
“States that expanded Medicaid enrollment under the Affordable care Act have arrest rates 20 to 30 percent lower than similar states that opted out of Medicaid expansion; the effect of Medicaid was especially large on the drug arrest rate (Simes and Jahn 2022).”
BackgroundPrior punishments and cumulative disadvantage: How supervision status impacts prison sentences*
Hickert, A., Bushway, S., Harding, D. J., & Morenoff, J. D. (2021) · Criminology (Beverly Hills) · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12290 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationCommunity investment interventions as a means for decarceration: A scoping review
Hawks, L., Lopoo, E., Puglisi, L., Cellini, J., Thompson, K., Halberstam, A., Tolliver, D., Martinez-Hamilton, S., & Wang, E. (2022) · The Lancet Regional Health - Americas · doi:10.1016/j.lana.2021.100150 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Better to Stay Home: Evaluating the Impact of Day Reporting Centers on Offending
Hyatt, J. M., & Ostermann, M. (2017) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0011128717727739 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Lee, C.-W. (2019) · Judicial Reform in Taiwan · doi:10.4324/9780203737187-9 · Cited by 14
Kirk, D. S. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190841232.001.0001 · Cited by 14 · cited 1× · see citing works
“High rates of incarceration for parole and probation violations coupled with the geographic concentration of people on supervision (Kirk 2020) create community-level harms. these emerge through the social and economic disruptions caused by many members of the community cycling in and out of prisons…”
BackgroundBook Review: The Chosen Ones: Black Men and the Politics of Redemption
Randolph, A. (2019) · Men and Masculinities · doi:10.1177/1097184x19832934 · Cited by 13 · cited 1×
“2019; Jones 2018; Miller 2020).”
Examining the effects of day reporting centers on recidivism: A meta-analysis
Wong, J. S., Bouchard, J., Lee, C.-W., & Gushue, K. (2019) · Journal of Offender Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/10509674.2019.1583300 · Cited by 12
Menefee, M. R., Harding, D. J., Nguyen, A. P., Morenoff, J. D., & Bushway, S. D. (2021) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/soab132 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Does Parole Make a Difference?@@@Parole: Crime Prevention? or Crime Postponement?
Genevie, L. E., Sacks, H. R., & Logan, C. (1982) · doi:10.2307/2068799 · Cited by 7 · cited 1×
“1982; Sacks and Logan 1980).”
Parole, Desistance from Crime, and Community Integration
National Research Council (2022) · CrimRxiv · doi:10.21428/cb6ab371.faff0d7c · Cited by 1 · cited 1×
“…this belief is both a cause and a consequence of the disproportionate representation of people of color throughout the criminal justice system, from arrest to pretrial detention, incarceration, and community supervision (Western 2006; Alexander 2010; Menendian and Rothstein 2020; Bradner et al.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
16 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Morrison, M., Hai, A., Bandaru, Y. S., Salas-Wright, C., & Vaughn, M. G. (2023) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1080/10826084.2023.2257319 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Probation and parole populations are typically studied as one population, broadly defined as under “community supervision” (Harding et al., 2022).”
BackgroundSalisbury, E. J., Belisle, L. A., Cowell, M. M., & Prince, K. C. (2023) · Feminist Criminology · doi:10.1177/15570851231194662 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Signi fi cant reform efforts are underway to rein in mass probation as a form of social control (Harding et al., 2022; Phelps, 2020).”
BackgroundBunaciu, A., Sondhi, A., Best, D., Hennessy, E. A., Best, J., Belanger, M. J., Leidi, A., Grimes, A., Conner, M., DeTriquet, R., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1177/00938548251359584 · Cited by 5
“In addition, CLS involvement may present complications such as legal and financial obligations, including probation or parole requirements, which can hinder reintegration into society post-release (Harding et al., 2022).”
Singh, S., Cox, A. L., Berezin, M., & Nalani, A. (2025) · Feminist Criminology · doi:10.1177/15570851251330916 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“But as the pendulum swung in the early 2000s, rehabilitation became foregrounded albeit nested within regimes that prioritize risk assessment, regulation, surveillance, and individual responsibilization (Harding et al., 2022; Phelps & Ruhland, 2022; Phillips, 2013; Werth, 2013).”
Home but not free: Rule‐breaking, withdrawal, and dignity in reentry
Slee, G. (2025) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12408 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Returning citizens face steep barriers to employment (Pager, 2003; Seim & Harding, 2020), housing stability (Harding et al., 2019; Western, 2018), and general well-being (Harding et al., 2022).”
The Rise of the Carceral State: Foundations and Contours of a Rapidly Changing Criminal Legal System
Wakefield, S., & Turney, K. (2025) · RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences · doi:10.7758/rsf.2025.11.3.04 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Failing to Maintain Contact With Probation: Discovering the Reasons Why
Ruhland, E. L., & Mitchell, K. (2026) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/00111287261473218 · Cited by 1
The wider network of social relationships and desistance from crime
Giordano, P. C., Copp, J. E., Swinehart, M., Manning, W. D., & Longmore, M. A. (2026) · Criminology (Beverly Hills) · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.70057 · Cited by 1
Verdadero, J. C., & Donato, L. M. (2026) · European Journal of Probation · doi:10.1177/20662203251413478 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Mass probation and mass incarceration are closely linked, creating a continuous cycle (Harding et al., 2022).”
Military Matters? The Impact of Veteran Status on Recidivism
Lopoo, M. E. (2025) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231251395474 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Thus, would-be rehabilitative resources like probation may be more onerous for the socially marginalized, resulting in delayed incarceration rather than acting as a substitute for it (Harding, Western, and Sandelson 2022; Lopoo, Schiraldi, and Ittner 2023; Phelps 2018).”
Uy, J. V. (2025) · Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.70838/pemj.480808 · Cited by 1
Alarid, L., & Jones, M. (2025) · Corrections · doi:10.1080/23774657.2025.2541964 · Cited by 1
Employment and mental health for adults on probation, 2002-2021.
Morrison, M., Hai, A., Bandaru, Y. S., Salas-Wright, C., & Vaughn, M. G. (2024) · Journal of public health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdae284 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Shifting the practice of coercive penal care over time in a problem-solving court
Omori, M., Lee, J. G., & Lautenschlager, R. (2023) · Punishment & Society · doi:10.1177/14624745231192367 · Cited by 1
“Although parole (as the main model of reentry) historically included goals of rehabilitation and reintegration, surveillance and monitoring have become increasingly important functions (Harding et al., 2022; Opsal, 2011; Simon, 1993).”
BackgroundJones, D., Barnes, C. C., & Garcia-Shinagawa, N. (2023) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/00111287221145319 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Some scholars have indicated that community supervision is ineffective in reducing recidivism (Harding et al., 2022).”
Practice and Prospects of Social Work Interventions in Community Corrections
Wang, X., & Lv, G.-Y. (2024) · International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.25236/ijfs.2024.061204 · Cited by 1
“However, Harding et al. (2022) highlight that individuals under community supervision face significant risks of arrest and incarceration, with little evidence supporting the claim that community supervision improves public safety.”
InfluentialIhle, A. D., Thomas, K. K., Wicks, B., Wang, M., Sisk, L. B., & McGrath, J. M. (2026) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-026-09495-2
The Impact of Curfews on Recidivism During Post-Release Supervision
Verweij, S., Wermink, H., Beijersbergen, K., & Blokland, A. (2026) · Justice quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2026.2712836
Housing-focused Reentry Financial Support as a Predictor of Reduced Recidivism: A Meta-Analysis
Robinson, E., McMahon, K. M., & Lapsey, D. S. (2026) · The Prison journal · doi:10.1177/00328855261473237
“However, it is also possible that those without the constant surveillance (i.e., those not in halfway houses, speci fi cally) are more successful due to less intense supervision (Harding et al., 2022; Lopoo et al., 2023).”
Yesharim, M., & Parks, K. (2026) · Journal of International Students · doi:10.32674/kgswet69
“However, in practice, community supervision is harsh and rigid in structure, creating more opportunities for a person to be further criminalized (Harding et al., 2022).”
How Formerly Incarcerated People Envision Technologies for Prison Parole
Savage, S., Nava, J., Zhou, W., & Lee, H. (2026) · Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3805689.3812258
Haro, C. L. (2026) · Justice, Opportunities, and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/2997965x.2026.2633145
“Individuals under community supervision may also be required to pay supervision fees or fines, which can further hinder their ability to afford stable housing or live in a safer neighborhood with lower crime rates (Harding et al., 2022).”
Evaluating the Ability of Risk Assessments to Predict Success in Texas Reentry Courts
Hartsell, E. N. (2026) · Justice Evaluation Journal · doi:10.1080/24751979.2025.2609083
Wang, X., Ah, S. H. A. B., & Azman, Z. (2025) · International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology · doi:10.1177/0306624x251363248
“They also frequently face unemployment, housing instability, and poor access to healthcare and support services (Harding et al., 2022).”
Commonness, Costliness, and Consequences of Monetary Sanctions
Bohmert, M. N., Ruhland, E. L., Ying, M., & Diaz, C. L. (2025) · Victims & Offenders · doi:10.1080/15564886.2025.2550644
“This is particularly true given that justice-involved individuals often have limited employment opportunities (Sykes et al., 2022) and commonly earn limited incomes when employed (Harding et al., 2022).”
Burch, M. (2024) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/730999
- Authors
- Harding, D. J., Western, B., & Sandelson, J. A.
- Corresponding author
- Harding, David J.
- Venue
- The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 701
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8-25
- ISSN
- 0002-7162 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3349
- OpenAlex
- W4295990797
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- probation, parole, community supervision, criminal justice reform, former prisoners, reentry, socio-economic integration, recidivism, post-release support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review