Cited by 65Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems

The Financial Cost of a Criminal Conviction: Context and Consequences

Pleggenkuhle, Breanne·2018·Criminal Justice and Behavior

Abstract

Growing fiscal concerns for criminal justice agencies and punitive ideological shifts have increased the financial consequences of a conviction. The growth in legal financial obligations (LFOs), such as fees, fines, and restitution resultant from conviction has important implications for offender reentry, particularly offender reintegration and opportunities for social advancement. Utilizing data culled from in-depth qualitative interviews with a sample of persons under correctional supervision, the current research documents the nature and prevalence of LFOs for an offending population and explores how they affect post-conviction experiences. The results indicate a majority of ex-offenders experience some form of LFO including fines, supervision costs, and child-support-related fees. Overall, LFOs diminished positive opportunities for offenders by compounding precarious financial states, limiting opportunities for upward social movement, and weakening positive cognitive change. As research consistently identifies primarily adverse consequences from LFOs, policy implications are explored to mitigate negative individual and social outcomes for offenders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0093854817734278

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People who owe LFO debts are discouraged from entering the formal economy or are forced to work low-wage jobs and forgo career-enhancing training/education.

    “are discouraged from entering formal economy or are forced to work low-wage jobs and forgo career-enhancing training/education (Harris et al., 2010; Ortiz & Jackey, 2019; Pleggenkuhle, 2018)”

    From Debt, Incarceration, and Re-entry: a Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as Pleggenkuhle, 2018

  • Between 66%-92% of people who have been incarcerated have child support debt.

    “Studies of all types found that between 66%–92% of people who have been incarcerated have child support debt (Nagrecha et al., 2015; Pearson & Davis, 2003; Pleggenkuhle, 2018; Roman & Link, 2015).”

    From Debt, Incarceration, and Re-entry: a Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as Pleggenkuhle, 2018

  • LFO debts can cause long term debt and damaged credit.

    “LFO debts can cause long term debt and damaged credit (Harris et al., 2010; Pleggenkuhle, 2018)”

    From Debt, Incarceration, and Re-entry: a Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as Pleggenkuhle, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pleggenkuhle, B.
Affiliations
Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
Corresponding author
Pleggenkuhle, Breanne
Venue
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Published
2017-09-27
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
121-145
ISSN
  • 0093-8548 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3594
OpenAlex
W2759087826
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
10.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Criminal Justice and Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Keywords
legal financial obligations, criminal conviction, fines, restitution, prisoner reentry, social mobility, cognitive change, ex-offenders, criminal justice costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review