CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 262Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesIncome, Poverty, and InequalityCultural Capital and Social Class

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Income Inequality and Class Divides in Parental Investments

Open access
Schneider, Daniel, Hastings, Orestes P., LaBriola, Joe·2018·American Sociological Review
DOI 10.1177/0003122418772034

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Historic increases in income inequality have coincided with widening class divides in parental investments of money and time in children. These widening class gaps are significant because parental investment is one pathway by which advantage is transmitted across generations. Using over three decades of micro-data from the Consumer Expenditure Survey and the American Heritage Time Use Survey linked to state-year measures of income inequality, we test the relationship between income inequality and class gaps in parental investment. We find robust evidence of wider class gaps in parental financial investments in children—but not parental time investments in children—when state-level income inequality is higher. We explore mechanisms that may drive the relationship between rising income inequality and widening class gaps in parental financial investments in children. This relationship is partially explained by the increasing concentration of income at the top of the income distribution in state-years with higher inequality, which gives higher-earning households more money to spend on financial investments in children. In addition, we find evidence for contextual effects of higher income inequality that reshape parental preferences toward financial investment in children differentially by class.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0003122418772034

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Bianchi Suzanne M., 2004, Social Inequality, 189
  2. Bray Mark, 1999, The Shadow Education System: Private Tutoring and its Implications for Planners
  3. Brien Michael, 1997, Journal of Human Resources, 32
  4. Evans William, 2004, Social Inequality
  5. Hout Michael, 2004, GSS Methodological Report #101
  6. Hurst Erik, 2010, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity
  7. Kaushal Neeraj, 2011, Whither Opportunity: Rising Inequality, Schools, and Children’s Life Chances, 187
  8. 10.1177/000312240206700507 · DOI
  9. Mare Robert D., 2006, Riron to Hoho (Sociological Theory and Methods), 21
  10. Phillips Meredith, 2011, Whither Opportunity: Rising Inequality, Schools, and Children’s Life Chances, 207
  11. Ramey Garey, 2010, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity
  12. Reardon Sean, 2011, Whither Opportunity: Rising Inequality, Schools, and Children’s Life Chances, 91
  13. Sacks Daniel, 2010, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Schneider, D., Hastings, O. P., & LaBriola, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Schneider, Daniel
ORCID
Venue
American Sociological Review
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2018-05-21
Volume
83
Issue
3
Pages
475-507
ISSN
  • 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8271
DOI
10.1177/0003122418772034
OpenAlex
W2803425653
Cited by
262
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 3
FWCI
52.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Science Framework
Funders
  • Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (1106400)
  • Russell Sage Foundation (83-17-15)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Capital and Social Class
Keywords
income inequality, parental investment, class division, contextual effects, parental preferences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review