Cited by 55Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsAppendicitis Diagnosis and ManagementOmental and Epiploic Conditions

Acute mesenteric ischemia: the importance of early surgical consultation

Eltarawy, Islam G., Etman, Yasser M., Zenati, Mazen, Simmons, Richard L., Rosengart, Matthew R.·2009·The American Surgeon™

Abstract

Acute mesenteric ischemia continues to be associated with high mortality. We hypothesized that delays in surgical consultation and operation are independently associated with increased mortality and sought to identify modifiable characteristics associated with delayed management. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 72 patients diagnosed with acute mesenteric ischemia. Twenty-six (36%) patients died, of which 14 (54%) had care withdrawn. Delay in operation (>6 hours after surgical consultation) was associated with increased mortality (adjusted OR 3.7; 90% CI, 1.1-12). For patients for whom care was not withdrawn, delay in surgical consultation (>24 hours after disease onset) was associated with increased mortality (adjusted OR, 9.4; 90% CI, 1.3-65), as was delay in operation (adjusted OR, 4.9; 90% CI, 1.1-22). For those managed medically, early surgical consultation was associated with improved mortality (Odds Ratio [OR], 0; 90% Confidence Interval [CI], 0-0.34). Patients with delayed surgical consultation were more likely to have abdominal distension, elevated lactate concentration, acute renal failure, vasopressor administration, and a lack of abdominal pain. The acquisition of CT imaging trended toward an association with delayed surgical consultation ( P = 0.06). We conclude that early surgical consultation is associated with improved outcome even for patients managed without operative intervention, and that CT imaging may delay appropriate care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000313480907500305

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinical signs of acute mesenteric ischaemia are non-specific and reliable specific biomarkers are lacking, so diagnosis is often delayed.

    “As clinical signs of AMI are non-specific and reliable specific biomarkers are lacking, the diagnosis is often delayed resulting in progression of intestinal ischaemia to transmural intestinal necrosis and peritonitis before the diagnosis is made.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eltarawy, I. G., Etman, Y. M., Zenati, M., Simmons, R. L., & Rosengart, M. R.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rosengart, Matthew R.
Venue
The American Surgeon™
Published
2009-03
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
212-219
ISSN
  • 0003-1348 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-9823
OpenAlex
W2460959009
Cited by
55
References
25
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Surgeon (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (KL2RR024154)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Omental and Epiploic Conditions
Keywords
acute mesenteric ischemia, delayed surgery, mortality, computed tomography, medical management, abdominal distension, lactate, acute kidney injury, vasopressors, abdominal pain
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Ischemia, Male, Mesentery, Middle Aged, Pennsylvania, Radiography, Abdominal, Referral and Consultation, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Logistic Models, Treatment Outcome, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review