The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Endoscopic and Videofluoroscopic Evaluations of Swallowing and Aspiration
Abstract
A new procedure for evaluating oropharyngeal dysphagia utilizing fiberoptic laryngoscopy was compared to the videofluoroscopy procedure. Twenty-one subjects were given both examinations within a 48-hour period. Results of the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and videofluoroscopy examinations were compared for presence or absence of abnormal events. Good agreement was found, especially for the finding of aspiration (90% agreement). The FEES was then measured against the videofluoroscopy study for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Sensitivity was 0.88 or greater for three of the four parameters measured. Specificity was lower overall, but was still 0.92 for detection of aspiration. It was concluded that the FEES is a valid and valuable tool for evaluating oropharyngeal dysphagia. Some specific patients and conditions that lend themselves to this procedure are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Test-retest variability in normal swallowing
Lof, G. L., & Robbins, J. (1990) · Dysphagia · doi:10.1007/bf02407271 · Cited by 133
Cited by
National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke.
Robinson, T. (2001) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pmj.77.906.286h · Cited by 608
Wirth, R., Dziewas, R., Beck, A. M., Clave, P., Heppner, H. J., Langmore, S., Leischker, A., Martino, R., Pluschinski, P., Rösler, A., et al. (2016) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s97481 · Cited by 548
Self-citationMethodology for detecting swallowing sounds
Takahashi, K., Groher, M., & Michi, K.-I. (1994) · Dysphagia · doi:10.1007/bf00262760 · Cited by 215
An Epidemiologic Study on Aging and Dysphagia in the Acute Care Hospitalized Population: 2000–2007
Leder, S. B., & Suiter, D. M. (2009) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000235824 · Cited by 94
Kidder, T. M., Langmore, S. E., & Martin, B. J. W. (1994) · Dysphagia · doi:10.1007/bf00301919 · Cited by 82
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schatz, K., Langmore, S. E., & Olson, N.
- Venue
- Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-08
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 678-681
- ISSN
- 0003-4894 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-572X
- OpenAlex
- W2065166017
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endoscopic and Videofluoroscopic Evaluations of Swallowing and Aspiration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/000348949110000815
- The paper
- Schatz, K., Langmore, S. E., & Olson, N. (1991). Endoscopic and Videofluoroscopic Evaluations of Swallowing and Aspiration. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949110000815
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
