Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective
Abstract
Contemporary social science analysis is dominated by utilitarian or functional approaches in which institutional structures are assumed to adapt in an optimal fashion to changing environmental conditions, and the preferences and capabilities of individual actors are ontologically posited. In contrast, an institutional perspective insists that past choices constrain present options; that the preferences and capabilities of individual actors are conditioned by institutional structures; and that historical trajectories are path dependent. Institutional structures persist even if circumstances change. In a world of nuclear weapons and economic interdependence, any adequate analysis of the nature of sovereignty operationalized with regard to transborder controls and extraterritoriality must be informed by an institutional perspective.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
Pierson, P. (2000) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586011 · Cited by 8,094 · see citing works
HISTORICAL INSTITUTIONALISM IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS
Thelen, K. (1999) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369 · Cited by 3,409 · see citing works
Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence
Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2006) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpj020 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Hummel, P., Braun, M., Tretter, M., & Dabrock, P. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951720982012 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Organizational Support and Volunteering Benefits for Older Adults
Tang, F., Choi, E., & Morrow-Howell, N. (2010) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnq020 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Coursey, D., Yang, K., & Pandey, S. K. (2012) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02581.x · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Problem Solving and Institutional Design
(1995) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037259 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
- Authors
- KRASNER, S. D.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- KRASNER, STEPHEN D.
- Venue
- Comparative Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1988-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66-94
- ISSN
- 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3829
- OpenAlex
- W1972602235
- Cited by
- 954
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 57.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Comparative Political Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Keywords
- sovereignty, institutional approach, path dependence, extraterritoriality, nuclear weapons, economic interdependence, institutional framework, historical trajectories, utilitarianism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review