Cited by 954International Relations and Foreign PolicyGlobalization and political ideologiesPolitical Conflict and Governance

Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective

KRASNER, STEPHEN D.·1988·Comparative Political Studies

Abstract

Contemporary social science analysis is dominated by utilitarian or functional approaches in which institutional structures are assumed to adapt in an optimal fashion to changing environmental conditions, and the preferences and capabilities of individual actors are ontologically posited. In contrast, an institutional perspective insists that past choices constrain present options; that the preferences and capabilities of individual actors are conditioned by institutional structures; and that historical trajectories are path dependent. Institutional structures persist even if circumstances change. In a world of nuclear weapons and economic interdependence, any adequate analysis of the nature of sovereignty operationalized with regard to transborder controls and extraterritoriality must be informed by an institutional perspective.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0010414088021001004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KRASNER, S. D.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
KRASNER, STEPHEN D.
Venue
Comparative Political Studies
Published
1988-04
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
66-94
ISSN
  • 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3829
OpenAlex
W1972602235
Cited by
954
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 31
FWCI
57.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Comparative Political Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
sovereignty, institutional approach, path dependence, extraterritoriality, nuclear weapons, economic interdependence, institutional framework, historical trajectories, utilitarianism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review