Data sovereignty: A review
Open accessAbstract
New data-driven technologies yield benefits and potentials, but also confront different agents and stakeholders with challenges in retaining control over their data. Our goal in this study is to arrive at a clear picture of what is meant by data sovereignty in such problem settings. To this end, we review 341 publications and analyze the frequency of different notions such as data sovereignty, digital sovereignty, and cyber sovereignty. We go on to map agents they concern, in which context they appear, and which values they allude to. While our sample reveals a considerable degree of divergence and an occasional lack of clarity about intended meanings of data sovereignty, we propose a conceptual grid to systematize different dimensions and connotations. Each of them relates in some way to meaningful control, ownership, and other claims to data articulated by a variety of agents ranging from individuals to countries. Data sovereignty alludes to a nuanced mixture of normative concepts such as inclusive deliberation and recognition of the fundamental rights of data subjects.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human Value Alignment concentrates on harmonizing AI models with human ethics and values to ensure decisions and actions mirror societal norms and ethical standards, involving integration of ethical decision-making and adaptation of AI outputs to conform with human moral values.
“This emerging aspect concentrates on harmonizing AI models with human ethics and values to ensure that their decisions and actions mirror societal norms and ethical standards, involving the integration of ethical decision-making processes and the adaptation of AI outputs to conform with human moral values [265], [89], [266].”
From From Google Gemini to OpenAI Q* (Q-Star): A Survey on Reshaping the Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Research Landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [265]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042 · see citing works
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386 · see citing works
Principles of Biomedical Ethics
(2012) · Thieves of Virtue · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9079.003.0009 · Cited by 13,453 · see citing works
Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective
KRASNER, S. D. (1988) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414088021001004 · Cited by 954 · see citing works
Significance and Challenges of Big Data Research
Jin, X., Wah, B. W.-S., Cheng, X., & Wang, Y. (2015) · Big Data Research · doi:10.1016/j.bdr.2015.01.006 · Cited by 779 · see citing works
(2016) · doi:10.22459/caepr38.11.2016 · Cited by 696 · see citing works
Huria, T., Palmer, S. C., Pitama, S. G., Beckert, L., Lacey, C. J., Ewen, S. C., & Smith, L. T. (2019) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0815-8 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
The Fight for Digital Sovereignty: What It Is, and Why It Matters, Especially for the EU
Floridi, L. (2020) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-020-00423-6 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
What does the notion of “sovereignty” mean when referring to the digital?
Couture, S., & Toupin, S. (2019) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819865984 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Schaar, P. (2010) · Identity in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s12394-010-0055-x · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Data science for building energy management: A review
Molina-Solana, M., Ros, M., Ruiz, M. D., Gómez‐Romero, J., & Martín-Bautista, M. J. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.132 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Indigenous Data Governance: Strategies from United States Native Nations
Carroll, S. R., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., & Martinez, A. (2019) · Data Science Journal · doi:10.5334/dsj-2019-031 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Dworkin, G. (1976) · The Hastings Center Report · doi:10.2307/3560358 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Genomic Research Through an Indigenous Lens: Understanding the Expectations
Garrison, N. A., Hudson, M. L., Ballantyne, L. L., Garba, I., Martinez, A. O., Taualii, M. M., Arbour, L. T., Caron, N. R., & Rainie, S. C. (2019) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015434 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Against Sovereignty in Cyberspace
Mueller, M. (2019) · International Studies Review · doi:10.1093/isr/viz044 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Distributed, decentralized, and democratized artificial intelligence
Montes, G. A., & Goertzel, B. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.010 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
How to write a systematic review of reasons
Strech, D., & Sofaer, N. (2011) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100096 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Datafication, development and marginalised urban communities: an applied data justice framework
Heeks, R., & Shekhar, S. (2019) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2019.1599039 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Government Cloud Computing and National Data Sovereignty
Irion, K. (2012) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.10 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing
Smedt, J. D., Ciccio, C. D., Vanthienen, J., et al. (2017) · Lecture notes in business information processing · Cited by 117 · see citing works
(2017) · Journal of Cloud Computing · doi:10.5171/jcc · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Rainie, S. C., Schultz, J. L., Briggs, E., Riggs, P., & Palmanteer-Holder, N. L. (2017) · International Indigenous Policy Journal · doi:10.18584/iipj.2017.8.2.1 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Digital Marketplaces Unleashed
Beltran, F. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-49275-8 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Computer Standards & Interfaces
Carminati, B. (2009) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Situating Data in a Trumpian Era: The Environmental Data and Governance Initiative
Dillon, L., Lave, R., Mansfield, B., Wylie, S., Shapiro, N., Chan, A. S., & Murphy, M. (2019) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2018.1511410 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Seddon, J. J. M., & Currie, W. L. (2013) · Health Policy and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2013.09.003 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Reviewing person's value of privacy of online social networking
Hugl, U. (2011) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662241111158290 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Hyperconnected Network: A Decentralized Trusted Computing and Networking Paradigm
Yin, H., Guo, D., Wang, K., Jiang, Z., Lyu, Y., & Xing, J. (2018) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2018.1700172 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Cloud computing: The beliefs and perceptions of Swedish school principals
Lim, N., Grönlund, Å., & Andersson, A. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.009 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Beier, K., Schweda, M., & Schicktanz, S. (2019) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-019-0799-7 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Fighting cyber crime and protecting privacy in the cloud
Bigo, D., Boulet, G., Bowden, C., et al. (2012) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 47 · see citing works
First Nations data sovereignty in Canada
Centre (2019) · Statistical Journal of the IAOS · doi:10.3233/sji-180478 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
On Data Sovereignty in Cloud-Based Computation Offloading for Smart Cities Applications
Esposito, C., Castiglione, A., Frattini, F., Cinque, M., Yang, Y., & Choo, K. R. (2018) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2886410 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Dehling, T., & Sunyaev, A. (2014) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-013-0150-6 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Gilbert, J., & Lennox, C. (2019) · The International Journal of Human Rights · doi:10.1080/13642987.2018.1562921 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
The place of conditionality and individual responsibility in a “data-driven economy”
König, P. D. (2017) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951717742419 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Marley, T. L. (2019) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764218799130 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Fu, M., Exeter, D. J., & Anderson, A. (2015) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.036 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Encryption-Based Solution for Data Sovereignty in Federated Clouds
Esposito, C., Castiglione, A., & Choo, K. R. (2016) · IEEE Cloud Computing · doi:10.1109/mcc.2016.18 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Private Data System Enabling Self-Sovereign Storage Managed by Executable Choreographies
Alboaie, S., & Cosovan, D. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59665-5_6 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Cloud computing, capabilities and intercultural ethics: Implications for Africa
Wakunuma, K., & Masika, R. (2017) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2017.07.006 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Towards data sovereignty in cyberspace
Nugraha, Y., Kautsarina, K., & Sastrosubroto, A. S. (2015) · doi:10.1109/icoict.2015.7231469 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Landmark-based data location verification in the cloud: review of approaches and challenges
Irain, M., Jorda, J., & Mammeri, Z. (2017) · Journal of Cloud Computing Advances Systems and Applications · doi:10.1186/s13677-017-0095-y · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Bodkin‐Andrews, G., Page, S., & Trudgett, M. (2019) · Australian Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/0004944119863927 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Towards Dependably Detecting Geolocation of Cloud Servers
Hippeläinen, L., Oliver, I., & Lal, S. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64701-2_51 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Interview with Reinhold Achatz on “Data Sovereignty and Data Ecosystems”
Otto, B. (2019) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-019-00609-z · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Doluschitz, R., Engler, B., & Hoffmann, C. (2009) · Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety · doi:10.1007/s00003-009-0527-9 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
A Note on the Security in the Card Management System of the German E-Health Card
Winandy, M. (2011) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23635-8_25 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Gembaczka, P., Heidemann, B., Bennertz, B., et al. (2019) · Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1515/cdbme-2019-0008 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The Cloud and data sovereignty after Snowden
Vaile, D. (2014) · Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy · doi:10.7790/ajtde.v2n1.31 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A contactless e-health information system with privacy
Plateaux, A., Lacharme, P., Rosenberger, C., et al. (2013) · International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC) · doi:10.1109/iwcmc.2013.6583805 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Preserving the owner’s autonomy in networks of patient registries and biobanks
Lablans, M., Kadioglu, D., Muscholl, M., et al. (2014) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/1750-1172-9-s1-p3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Strengthening the security of critical data in cyberspace, a policy review
Setiawan, A. B., & Sastrosubroto, A. S. (2016) · International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and its Applications · doi:10.1109/ic3ina.2016.7863047 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Perspectives on Linkage Involving Indigenous data
Walker, J. D., Healy, B. A., Healy, C., et al. (2018) · International Journal for Population Data Science · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v3i4.999 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Land grab / data grabPreprint
Fraser, A. (2017) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/9utyh · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Courtney, M. G. (2013) · Engineering & Technology · doi:10.1049/et.2013.0411 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Introducing the global data privacy prize
Kuner, C., Cate, F. H., Lynskey, O., et al. (2019) · International Data Privacy Law · doi:10.1093/idpl/ipz002 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
How to implement a robust BCDR plan
Weeks, R. (2019) · Computer Fraud & Security · doi:10.1016/s1361-3723(19)30073-9 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Nu@ge: Towards a solidary and responsible cloud computing service
Balouek‐Thomert, D., Caron, E., Gallard, P., et al. (2015) · doi:10.1109/cloudtech.2015.7337006 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Industrial Companies in Innovation Ecosystems
Noll, F., Lüke, W., Wappler, M., et al. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) · doi:10.1109/ice.2018.8436300 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
On Technology Innovations, Digitalisation and Social Security in the 21st Century
Meyer, H. (2016) · Communication Today · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Hoffmann A, Wagner A, Huyeng T, et al. (2019) Distributed manufacturer services to provide product data on the web. In: CEUR workshop proceedings, EG-ICE 2019 Workshop on Intelligent Computing in Engineering, Leuven, Belgium, 30 June-3 July 2019.
- Hummel P, Braun M, Augsberg S, et al. (2018) Sovereignty and data sharing. ITU Journal: ICT Discoveries 2.
- Kukutai T and Cormack D (2018) Census 2018 and implica- tions for M aori. New Zealand Population Review 44: 131-151.
- Woods AK (2018) Litigating data sovereignty. Yale Law Journal 128(2): 328-406.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McIntosh, T. R., Susnjak, T., Liu, T., Watters, P., Xu, D., Liu, D., & Halgamuge, M. N. (2025) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies13020051 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
“Additionally, issues of data sovereignty and copyright emphasize the need for robust encryption, access control, and continuous security assessments [233], [234].”
BackgroundWang, R., Zhang, C., & Lei, Y. (2024) · The International Spectator · doi:10.1080/03932729.2024.2315064 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hummel, P., Braun, M., Tretter, M., & Dabrock, P.
- Affiliations
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Hummel, Patrik
- Venue
- Big Data & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2053-9517 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3124662721
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 105 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 22
- FWCI
- 352.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Big Data & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- OPUS FAU (Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund Berlin-Brandenburg (KOBV), on behalf of the Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen-Nürnberg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Gesundheit ((ZMV/1–2517 FSB 013))
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung ((01GP1905B))
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
- Keywords
- data sovereignty, digital sovereignty, cyber sovereignty, data ownership, data control, data subject rights, stakeholder perspectives, data governance, inclusive deliberation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review