CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 108Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychometric Properties of Shortened Versions of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire

Netemeyer, Richard G., Williamson, Donald A., Burton, Scot, Biswas, Dipayan, Jindal, Supriya, Landreth, Stacy, Mills, Gregory, Primeaux, Sonya·2002·Educational and Psychological Measurement
DOI 10.1177/0013164402062001008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Measures of depression are increasingly being used as outcomes or predictors by organizational and consumer psychologists. One such measure is the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ). However, questions about the 30-item ATQ’s factor structure and its length for use in survey research remain. The authors offer 15-and 8-item shortened versions of the ATQ. Two samples ( n = 434 and n = 419) were used to derive the reduced versions. A single factor was found to underlie both reduced versions, with scores on this factor yielding strong estimates of internal consistency and nomological validity. Two more cross-validation samples ( n = 163 and n = 91) also showed support for the 15-and 8-item versions. Overall, results suggest that these reduced-item versions of the ATQ are useful alternatives to measuring cognitions associated with depression.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0013164402062001008

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Black, D. W., 1996, Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 57, 50
  2. Charles, S.B.M., World Congress of Cognitive Therapy
  3. Dahlstrom, W. G., 1972, An MMPI handbook: Clinical interpretation, Vol. 1
  4. 10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.57 · DOI
  5. 1999, Gambling Impact and Behavior Study
  6. 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Jöreskog, K. G., 1996, LISRESL8: User’s reference guide

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 108

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Netemeyer, R. G., Williamson, D. A., Burton, S., Biswas, D., Jindal, S., Landreth, S., Mills, G., & Primeaux, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
  • University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Netemeyer, Richard G.
ORCID
Venue
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2002-02
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
111-129
ISSN
  • 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3888
DOI
10.1177/0013164402062001008
OpenAlex
W2021590390
Cited by
108
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire, depression, cognitive distortions, short-form questionnaire, factor structure, internal consistency, nomological validity, cross-validation, psychometric properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review