The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
My Current Thoughts on Coefficient Alpha and Successor Procedures
Abstract
In 1997, noting that the 50th anniversary of the publication of “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests” was fast approaching, Lee Cronbach planned what have become the notes published here. His aimwas to point out theways in which his views on coefficient alpha had evolved, doubting nowthat the coefficientwas the bestway of judging the reliability of an instrument to which it was applied. Tracing in these notes, in vintage Cronbach style, his thinking before, during, and after the publication of the alpha paper, his “current thoughts” on coefficient alpha are that alpha covers only a small perspective of the range of measurement uses for which reliability information is needed and that it should be viewed within a much larger system of reliability analysis, generalizability theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Self-citationTHEORY OF GENERALIZABILITY: A LIBERALIZATION OF RELIABILITY THEORY†
Cronbach, L. J., Rajaratnam, N., & Gleser, G. C. (1963) · British Journal of Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1963.tb00206.x · Cited by 737
Self-citation
Cited by
Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here.
McNeish, D. (2018) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000144 · Cited by 2,533
Current Concepts in Validity and Reliability for Psychometric Instruments: Theory and Application
Cook, D. A., & Beckman, T. J. (2006) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036 · Cited by 1,745
Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity
McCrae, R. R., Kurtz, J. E., Yamagata, S., & Terracciano, A. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868310366253 · Cited by 874
Rethinking Internal Consistency in Cronbach’s Alpha
Vaske, J. J., Beaman, J., & Sponarski, C. C. (2017) · Leisure Sciences · doi:10.1080/01490400.2015.1127189 · Cited by 856
Ponterotto, J. G., & Ruckdeschel, D. E. (2007) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.105.3.997-1014 · Cited by 555
Greco, L. A., Lambert, W., & Baer, R. A. (2008) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.20.2.93 · Cited by 514
Okan, O., Bollweg, T. M., Berens, E.-M., Hurrelmann, K., Bauer, U., & Schaeffer, D. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17155503 · Cited by 418
Making Reliability Reliable: A Systematic Approach to Reliability Coefficients
Cho, E. (2016) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428116656239 · Cited by 378
Measuring health literacy in Asia: Validation of the HLS-EU-Q47 survey tool in six Asian countries
Duong, T. V., Aringazina, A., Baisunova, G., Nurjanah, Pham, T. V., Pham, K. M., Truong, T. Q., Nguyen, K. T., Oo, W. M., Mohamad, E., et al. (2017) · Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.je.2016.09.005 · Cited by 329
Children's Somatization Inventory: Psychometric Properties of the Revised Form (CSI-24)
Walker, L. S., Beck, J. E., Garber, J., & Lambert, W. (2009) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsn093 · Cited by 320
Measuring experiential avoidance in adults: the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire
Schmalz, J. E., & Murrell, A. R. (2010) · International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy · doi:10.1037/h0100908 · Cited by 65
Slingerland, M., Haerens, L., Cardon, G., & Borghouts, L. (2014) · European Physical Education Review · doi:10.1177/1356336x13496000 · Cited by 56
Diotaiuti, P., Valente, G., Mancone, S., Grambone, A., & Chirico, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.773363 · Cited by 55
Measuring and building lean thinking for value creation in supply chains
Shamah, R. A. M. (2013) · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma · doi:10.1108/20401461311310490 · Cited by 40
(2013) · Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) · Cited by 25
Crossing the seven Cs of internal consistency: Assessing the reliability of formative instruments
Gruijters, S. L. K., Fleuren, B. P. I., & Peters, G. J. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qar39 · Cited by 17
Ringo, D. S. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2475268 · Cited by 18
Miaja Ávila, M., & De la Rubia, J. M. (1970) · Psicooncología · doi:10.5209/psic.57088 · Cited by 10
Woodley of Menie, M. A., Fernandes, H. B. F., Kanazawa, S., & Dutton, E. (2018) · HOMO · doi:10.1016/j.jchb.2018.06.003 · Cited by 9
Ringo, D. S., & Kibambila, V. K. (2025) · Journal of Trade Science · doi:10.1108/jts-03-2024-0013 · Cited by 9
Bansal, S., Kumar, D., & Garg, N. (2026) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/ijcma-06-2025-0186
Metadata
- Authors
- Cronbach, L. J., & Shavelson, R. J.
- Venue
- Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 391-418
- ISSN
- 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3888
- OpenAlex
- W2145482311
- Cited by
- 1,606
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.