Cited by 121Education, Achievement, and GiftednessStudent Stress and CopingResilience and Mental Health

Coping as Part of Motivational Resilience in School: A Multidimensional Measure of Families, Allocations, and Profiles of Academic Coping

Skinner, Ellen, Pitzer, Jennifer, Steele, Joel·2013·Educational and Psychological Measurement

Abstract

A study was designed to examine a multidimensional measure of children’s coping in the academic domain as part of a larger model of motivational resilience. Using items tapping multiple ways of dealing with academic problems, including five adaptive ways (strategizing, help-seeking, comfort-seeking, self-encouragement, and commitment) and six maladaptive ways (confusion, escape, concealment, self-pity, rumination, and projection), analyses of self-reports collected from 1,020 third through sixth graders in fall and spring of the same school year showed that item sets marking each way of coping were generally unidimensional and internally consistent; and confirmatory analyses showed that multidimensional models provided a good fit to the data for both adaptive and maladaptive coping at both time points. Of greatest interest were the connections of these ways of coping to the constructs from a model of motivational resilience. As predicted, adaptive coping was positively correlated with students’ self-system processes of relatedness, competence, and autonomy as well as their ongoing engagement and reengagement, and negatively correlated with their catastrophizing appraisals and emotional reactivity. Maladaptive coping showed the opposite pattern of correlations. The potential utility of the measure, the different scores derived from it, and the role of constructive coping in motivational resilience are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0013164413485241

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skinner, E., Pitzer, J., & Steele, J.
Affiliations
Portland State University (US)
Venue
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Published
2013-04-30
Volume
73
Issue
5
Pages
803-835
ISSN
  • 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3888
OpenAlex
W2025368225
Cited by
121
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
coping, academic coping, adaptive coping, maladaptive coping, self-determination theory, relatedness, competence, autonomy, student engagement, re-engagement, catastrophizing, emotional reactivity, elementary school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review