Cited by 924Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsBehavioral and Psychological StudiesInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

A Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Intervention Programs Designed to Support Autonomy

Su, Yu-Lan, Reeve, Johnmarshall·2011·Educational Psychology Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10648-010-9142-7

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing interventions designed to increase student need satisfaction and motivation through autonomy-supportive practices are supported.

    “thereby providing support for existing interventions designed to increase student need satisfaction and motivation through autonomy-supportive practices (Su & Reeve, 2011; Vasquez et al., 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Su, Y.-L., & Reeve, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Korea University (KR)
Corresponding author
Su, Yu-Lan
Venue
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2010-09-25
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
159-188
ISSN
  • 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-336X
OpenAlex
W2151843199
Cited by
924
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 138 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 154 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
autonomy support, intervention effectiveness, training program, moderators of intervention effectiveness, skill-based training, teachers, trainees, training session duration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review