The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq)
Abstract
This paper reports on a new self-report, Likert-scaled instrument that was designed to assess motivation and use of learning strategies by college students. The motivation scales tap into three broad areas: (1) value (intrinsic and extrinsic goal orientation, task value), (2) expectancy (control beliefs about learning, self-efficacy); and (3) affect (test anxiety). The learning strategies section is comprised of nine scales which can be distinguished as cognitive, metacognitive, and resource management strategies. The cognitive strategies scales include (a) rehearsal, (b) elaboration, (c) organization, and (d) critical thinking. Metacognitive strategies are assessed by one large scale that includes planning, monitoring, and regulating strategies. Resource management strategies include (a) managing time and study environment; (b) effort management, (c) peer learning, and (d) help-seeking. Scale reliabilities are robust, and confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated good factor structure. In addition, the instrument shows reasonable predictive validity to the actual course performance of students.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Established learning questionnaires (e.g., Pintrich et al. 1993) provide students with strategies or procedures, asking them to indicate whether and/or how often they apply the respective strategies.”
From Transfer of metacognitive skills in self-regulated learning: an experimental training study (2020) · cites this paper as Pintrich et al. 1993
In the citing paper
“As indicated in the original study (Pintrich et al., 1993), this scale demonstrates good reliability and validity (Cronbach's alpha = 0.80).”
From The role of critical thinking on undergraduates' reliance behaviours on generative AI in problem‐solving (2025) · cites this paper as Pintrich et al., 1993
Citations
Cites
Handbook of research on teaching
Wittrock, M. C. (1986) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 10,630
Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances.
Land, K. C., & Hayduk, L. A. (1990) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579660 · Cited by 1,313
A Process-Oriented View of Student Motivation and Cognition.
Pintrich, P. (1988) · New Directions for Institutional Research · doi:10.1002/ir.37019885707 · Cited by 255
Self-citationMckeachie, W., Pintrich, P., & Lin, Y.-G. (1985) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2003_5 · Cited by 159
Self-citationStructural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances
Wardrop, J. L., Hayduk, L. A., & Bollen, K. A. (1993) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1165186 · Cited by 127
Survey of study habits and attitutes
Brown, W. F., & Holtzman, W. H. (1965) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 117
Student learning and college teaching
Pintrich, P. (1988) · New Directions for Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1002/tl.37219883308 · Cited by 103
Self-citationTeaching a Course in Learning to Learn
Pintrich, P. R., McKeachie, W. J., & Lin, Y.-G. (1987) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15328023top1402_3 · Cited by 80
Self-citationSurvey of Study Habits and Attitudes
Brown, W. F., & Holtzman, W. H. (1953) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t06896-000 · Cited by 79
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Joreskog, K. G., 1986, LISREL: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood: User's guide
- Pintrich, P. R., 1989, Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation-enhancing environments, 117
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,012
Wertz, R. E. H. (2021) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100832 · Cited by 108
Liao, C.-H., & Wu, J.-Y. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104599 · Cited by 89
Li, T. M. H., Chau, M., Wong, P. W. C., Lai, E. S., & Yip, P. S. F. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2316 · Cited by 89
Medical student changes in self-regulated learning during the transition to the clinical environment
Cho, K. K., Marjadi, B., Langendyk, V., & Hu, W. C. Y. (2017) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-017-0902-7 · Cited by 95
Wong, J. T., & Hughes, B. S. (2022) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-022-09342-1 · Cited by 89
A shared document‐based annotation tool to support learner‐centred collaborative learning
Nokelainen, P., Miettinen, M., Kurhila, J., Floréen, P., & Tirri, H. (2005) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00474.x · Cited by 89
Analysing adaptive scaffolds that help students develop self‐regulated learning behaviours
Munshi, A., Biswas, G., Baker, R., Ocumpaugh, J., Hutt, S., & Paquette, L. (2023) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12761 · Cited by 88
Goals, Efficacy and Metacognitive Self-Regulation A Path Analysis
Al-Harthy, I. S., Was, C. A., & Isaacson, R. M. (2010) · International Journal of Education · doi:10.5296/ije.v2i1.357 · Cited by 90
Revisiting the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire
Dunn, K. E., Lo, W., Mulvenon, S. W., & Sutcliffe, R. A. (2011) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164411413461 · Cited by 99
Kim, Y., Brady, A. C., & Wolters, C. A. (2020) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101872 · Cited by 95
Limone, P., Sinatra, M., Ceglie, F., & Monacis, L. (2020) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs10120184 · Cited by 101
Validation of the Mathematics Motivation Questionnaire (MMQ) for secondary school students
Fiorella, L., Yoon, S. Y., Atit, K., Power, J., Panther, G., Sorby, S., Uttal, D. H., & Veurink, N. L. (2021) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-021-00307-x · Cited by 105
Neroni, J., Meijs, C. J. C., Kirschner, P. A., Xu, K. M., & de Groot, R. H. M. (2022) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-022-09696-5 · Cited by 88
Micari, M., & Drane, D. L. (2011) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787411415078 · Cited by 87
The relationship between mobile learning and self-regulated learning: A systematic review
Palalas, A., & Wark, N. (2020) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.5650 · Cited by 87
Naumann, J., Richter, T., Christmann, U., & Groeben, N. (2008) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.08.007 · Cited by 93
Wang, C., Kim, D., Bong, M., & Ahn, H. S. (2013) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.004 · Cited by 87
Shaw, R.-S. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.001 · Cited by 87
The role of the college classroom climate on academic procrastination
Corkin, D. M., Yu, S. L., Wolters, C. A., & Wiesner, M. (2014) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.04.001 · Cited by 95
The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire: score validity among medicine residents
Cook, D. A., Thompson, W. G., & Thomas, K. G. (2011) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04077.x · Cited by 87
Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (2005) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-004-6224-8 · Cited by 96
Kelly, S. E., Rice, C. D., Wyatt, B., Ducking, J., & Denton, Z. (2015) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2015.1014383 · Cited by 86
Daily interest, engagement, and autonomy support in the high school science classroom
Patall, E. A., Vasquez, A. C., Steingut, R. R., Trimble, S. S., & Pituch, K. A. (2016) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.06.002 · Cited by 94
Effects of games on students’ emotions of learning science and achievement in chemistry
Chen, S.-F., Husnaini, S. J., & Chen, J. (2020) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1817607 · Cited by 63
The impact of persuasive SMS on students' self‐regulated learning
Goh, T., Seet, B., & Chen, N. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01236.x · Cited by 88
Interrelations between self‐efficacy and learning approaches: a developmental approach
Phan, H. P. (2011) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2010.545050 · Cited by 86
Taking control of research on volitional control: challenges for future theory and research
Pintrich, P. R. (1999) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s1041-6080(99)80007-7 · Cited by 92
Self-citationFifth graders metacognitive knowledge: general or domain-specific?
Neuenhaus, N., Artelt, C., Lingel, K., & Schneider, W. (2011) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-010-0040-7 · Cited by 85
Student perceptions and performance in online and offline collaboration in an interior design studio
Cho, J. Y., & Cho, M. (2014) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-014-9265-0 · Cited by 85
The self-regulation for learning online (SRL-O) questionnaire
Broadbent, J., Panadero, E., Lodge, J. M., & Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz, M. (2022) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-022-09319-6 · Cited by 105
Self-Regulated Learning with a Text-Highlighting Strategy
Leutner, D., Leopold, C., & den Elzen-Rump, V. (2007) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/0044-3409.215.3.174 · Cited by 85
Student interest: A two-study re-examination of the concept
Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Cayanus, J. L. (2005) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463370500055996 · Cited by 85
Modeling the Mediating Role of Volition in the Learning Process
García, T., McCann, E. J., Turner, J. E., & Roska, L. A. (1998) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0982 · Cited by 89
Moreira, P., Dias, P. C., Vaz, F. M., & Vaz, J. M. (2012) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.016 · Cited by 99
Evidence for the Latent Factor Structure of the MSLQ
Hilpert, J. C., STEMPIEN, J. A., Kraft, K. J. V. D. H., & Husman, J. E. (2013) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244013510305 · Cited by 85
Help-Seeking in an Academic Context: A Systematic Review
Martín-Arbós, S., Castarlenas, E., & Dueñas, J.-M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13084460 · Cited by 84
Rubenstein, L. D., Callan, G. L., & Ridgley, L. M. (2017) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9431-5 · Cited by 88
Biasutti, M., & Frate, S. (2018) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-018-9583-0 · Cited by 84
Li, S., Du, H., Xing, W., Zheng, J., Chen, G., & Xie, C. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103987 · Cited by 90
Yang-xi, H., Zhao, S., & Ng, L. L. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752793 · Cited by 94
Johnson, M. L., Taasoobshirazi, G., Kestler, J. L., & Cordova, J. R. (2014) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2014.893560 · Cited by 84
Applying learning strategy questionnaires: problems and possibilities
Schellings, G. L. M. (2011) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9069-5 · Cited by 90
Online learning: Are subjective perceptions of instructional context related to academic success?
Artino, A. R. (2009) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.07.003 · Cited by 95
Zhang, L., Karabenick, S. A., Maruno, S., & Lauermann, F. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.003 · Cited by 85
Follmer, D. J., & Sperling, R. A. (2016) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12123 · Cited by 96
Jackson, C. R. (2018) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/2332858418809346 · Cited by 83
Motivational and affective engagement in learning Spanish with a mobile application
Cho, M., & Castañeda, D. A. (2019) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.01.008 · Cited by 83
Zhu, M., & Doo, M. Y. (2021) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-021-09301-2 · Cited by 89
Influencing University Students' Achievement and Motivation in a Technology Course
Hancock, D. R., Bray, M., & Nason, S. A. (2002) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220670209596611 · Cited by 83
Rozendaal, J. S., Minnaert, A. E. M. G., & Boekaerts, M. (2005) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.011 · Cited by 83
Hall, N. C., Perry, R. P., Goetz, T., Ruthig, J. C., Stupnisky, R. H., & Newall, N. E. G. (2007) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.04.002 · Cited by 83
The role of passion in education: A systematic review
Ruiz-Alfonso, Z., & León, J. (2016) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.09.001 · Cited by 94
Measuring epistemological beliefs in history education: An exploration of naïve and nuanced beliefs
Stoel, G. L., Logtenberg, A., Wansink, B., Huijgen, T., van Boxtel, C., & van Drie, J. P. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.03.003 · Cited by 96
Ofori, R. (2000) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1054/nedt.1999.0396 · Cited by 82
Lai, J., & Chang, L.-T. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211047549 · Cited by 92
The relationship between flexible and self-regulated learning in open and distance universities
Bergamin, P. B., Ziska, S., Werlen, E., & Siegenthaler, E. (2012) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1124 · Cited by 83
An educational game for learning human immunology: What do students learn and how do they perceive?
Cheng, M., Su, T., Huang, W., & Chen, J. (2013) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12098 · Cited by 81
Bauer, K. N., Orvis, K. A., Ely, K., & Surface, E. (2016) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-015-9401-1 · Cited by 80
Erfassung selbstregulierten Lernens mit Selbstberichtsverfahren
Spörer, N., & Brunstein, J. C. (2006) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/1010-0652.20.3.147 · Cited by 81
Zhang, Y., Hawk, S., Zhang, X.-H., & Zhao, H.-Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00573 · Cited by 77
Grunschel, C., Patrzek, J., Klingsieck, K. B., & Fries, S. (2018) · Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community · doi:10.1080/10852352.2016.1198166 · Cited by 95
Soemantri, D., McColl, G., & Dodds, A. E. (2018) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1384-y · Cited by 80
Curzon, P., Bell, T., Waite, J., & Dorling, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.018 · Cited by 85
Gan, Z., Liu, F., & Nang, H. (2023) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs13050428 · Cited by 80
Student motivations as predictors of high-level cognitions in project-based classrooms
Stolk, J. D., & Harari, J. R. (2014) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787414554873 · Cited by 80
León, J., Medina-Garrido, E., & Alonso, J. L. N. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00895 · Cited by 84
Investigating the Impact of Gamification on Student Motivation, Engagement, and Performance
García-López, I. M., Acosta-Gonzaga, E., & Ruiz-Ledesma, E. F. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13080813 · Cited by 78
Cheng, M. H. M., & Wan, Z. H. (2017) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2017.03.001 · Cited by 78
Gonzaga, E. A., & Ramírez-Arellano, A. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142013419 · Cited by 95
Does homework behavior mediate the relation between personality and academic performance?
Lubbers, M. J., van der Werf, G. P. C., Kuyper, H., & Hendriks, A. A. J. (2010) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.01.005 · Cited by 78
Dunn, K. E., Rakes, G. C., & Rakes, T. A. (2014) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.891426 · Cited by 87
Turkish high school students' biology achievement in relation to academic self-regulation
Yumusak, N., Sungur, S., & Çakıroğlu, J. (2007) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803610600853749 · Cited by 80
Learning opportunities to support student self-regulation: comparing different instructional formats
van Grinsven, L., & Tillema, H. (2006) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00131880500498495 · Cited by 77
Progress feedback effects on students' writing mastery goal, self-efficacy beliefs, and performance
Duijnhouwer, H., Prins, F. J., & Stokking, K. M. (2010) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611003711393 · Cited by 83
Shih, S. (2005) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/496906 · Cited by 82
How Instructional Methods Influence Skill Development in Management Education
Cajiao, J., & Burke, M. J. (2015) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2013.0354 · Cited by 81
Xie, K., Hensley, L. C., Law, V., & Sun, Z. (2017) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12594 · Cited by 88
Student and school SES, gender, strategy use, and achievement
Callan, G. L., Marchant, G. J., Finch, W. H., & Flegge, L. G. (2017) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22049 · Cited by 76
Achuthan, K., Francis, S. P., & Diwakar, S. (2017) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9626-x · Cited by 76
Development and validation of the brief regulation of motivation scale
Kim, Y., Brady, A. C., & Wolters, C. A. (2018) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.12.010 · Cited by 86
Hertel, S., & Karlen, Y. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12402 · Cited by 89
Panadero, E. (2023) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2023.2223642 · Cited by 76
Jamieson‐Noel, D., & Winne, P. H. (2003) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024//1010-0652.17.34.159 · Cited by 79
Kennedy, G. J., & Tuckman, B. W. (2013) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-013-9220-z · Cited by 82
Cheang, K. I. (2009) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.1016/s0002-9459(24)00576-x · Cited by 76
Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning
Winne, P. H., & Azevedo, R. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108888295.007 · Cited by 79
García, G. G., Navas-Parejo, M. R., de la Cruz-Campos, J. C., & Jiménez, C. R. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191610433 · Cited by 75
MacIntyre, P. D., & Blackie, R. A. (2012) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2012.10.014 · Cited by 75
Modeling students' time management in math homework
Xu, J., Yuan, R., Xu, B., & Xu, M. (2014) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.011 · Cited by 76
Individual differences in motivation: Traits and self-regulatory skills.
Kanfer, R., & Heggestad, E. D. (2004) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10315-013 · Cited by 75
Margulieux, L. E., Ketenci, T., & Decker, A. (2019) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2018.1562145 · Cited by 78
Combined Training of One Cognitive and One Metacognitive Strategy Improves Academic Writing Skills
Wischgoll, A. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00187 · Cited by 74
Papamitsiou, Z. K., & Economides, A. A. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12747 · Cited by 74
Cheng, G., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104948 · Cited by 74
Self-Efficacy and Academic Achievement – A Case From Turkey
Köseoğlu, Y. (2015) · Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform) · Cited by 74
Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Advanced Academics · doi:10.1177/1932202x0902000402 · Cited by 75
Chang, Y.-C., Peng, H. Y., & Chao, H.-C. (2009) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820802574270 · Cited by 74
The Development and Testing of the Instructional Beliefs Model
Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Myers, S. A. (2010) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.491122 · Cited by 74
The relationship between epistemological beliefs and the propensity for lifelong learning
Bath, D. M., & Smith, C. (2009) · Studies in Continuing Education · doi:10.1080/01580370902927758 · Cited by 74
Determinants of domain knowledge and independent study learning in an adult sample.
Ackerman, P. L., & Beier, M. E. (2006) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.366 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- The University of Michigan Ann Arbor
- Venue
- Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 801-813
- ISSN
- 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3888
- OpenAlex
- W2070635017
- Cited by
- 3,646
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 132 · 2025: 202 · 2024: 219 · 2023: 227 · 2022: 209 · 2021: 226 · 2020: 220 · 2019: 250 · 2018: 184 · 2017: 181 · 2016: 183 · 2015: 200 · 2014: 141 · 2013: 166 · 2012: 130
- FWCI
- 9.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, learning strategies, academic motivation, self-efficacy, test anxiety, goal orientation, task value, metacognitive strategies, cognitive strategies, resource management strategies, university students, course performance, instrument validation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review