Cited by 82Mental Health Treatment and AccessObesity and Health PracticesPsychology and Mental Health

Health care providers and people with mental illness: an integrative review on anti-stigma interventions

Carrara, Bruna Sordi, Fernandes, Raquel Helena Hernandez, Bobbili, Sireesha Jennifer, Ventura, Carla Aparecida Arena·2021·International Journal of Social Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health care providers are an important target group for anti-stigma interventions because they have the potential to convey stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental illness. This can have a detrimental impact on the quality and effectiveness of care provided to those affected by mental illness. AIMS AND METHODS: Whittemore & Knafl's integrative review method (2005) was used to analyze 16 studies investigating anti-stigma interventions targeting health care providers. RESULTS: The interventions predominantly involved contact-based educational approaches which ranged from training on mental health (typically short-term), showing videos or films (indirect social contact) to involving people with lived experiences of mental illness (direct social contact). A few studies focused on interventions involving educational strategies without social contact, such as mental health training (courses/modules), distance learning via the Internet, lectures, discussion groups, and simulations. One study investigated an online anti-stigma awareness-raising campaign that aimed to reduce stigmatizing attitudes among health care providers. CONCLUSION: Anti-stigma interventions that involve social contact between health care providers and people with mental illness, target specific mental illnesses and include long-term follow-up strategies seem to be the most promising at reducing stigma towards mental illness among health care providers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0020764020985891

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Simulations have consistently been associated with stigma reductions.

    “One of the areas that has received increasing attention for health-care students and professionals is the use of simulations (eg, standardised role-plays with actors), which have consistently been associated with stigma reductions.147,153,157”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carrara, B. S., Fernandes, R. H. H., Bobbili, S. J., & Ventura, C. A. A.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Ventura, Carla Aparecida Arena
Venue
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Published
2020-12-30
Volume
67
Issue
7
Pages
840-853
ISSN
  • 0020-7640 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2854
OpenAlex
W3113812764
Cited by
82
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Social Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
fundação de amparo à pesquisa do estado de são paulo
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
stigma reduction interventions, mental health stigma, healthcare workers, stigmatizing attitudes, lived experience of mental illness, mental health training, social contact, mental health care quality
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Mental Disorders, Health Personnel, Humans, Mental Health, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review