Cited by 43Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthCOVID-19 and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

COVID-19, Prolonged Grief Disorder and the role of social work

Open access
Johns, Lise, Blackburn, Pippa, McAuliffe, Donna·2020·International Social Work

Abstract

The death rate that we are seeing from COVID-19 is unimaginable, with experts predicting the pandemic will ultimately claim hundreds of thousands of lives. The death toll has already far exceeded the total population of renown cities such as Miami, USA or Canberra, Australia. Behind each death listed as a statistic, there is a social network of family and friends who will be profoundly impacted by the loss. The usual funerals, rituals and customs that occur after a death are now the new casualty of the virus. Indisputably, restrictions are necessary to curb the spread; however, concerns are raised regarding how this will impede on the ‘normal’ grieving process. Undoubtedly, there will be a surge in persons developing bereavement complexities in future years, with a direct correlated link to COVID-19.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0020872820941032

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Restrictions may further exacerbate distress as family and friends are unable to say goodbye to loved ones in a way that satisfies their personal, cultural or religious practices.

    “Restrictions may further exacerbate distress as family and friends are unable to say goodbye to loved ones in a way that satisfies their personal, cultural or religious practices (Johns et al., 2020).”

    From Living through lockdown: A qualitative exploration of individuals' experiences in the UK. (2022) · cites this paper as Johns et al., 2020

    The Abstract says COVID-19 restrictions disrupt funerals, rituals and customs and may impede normal grieving for family and friends. It does not specifically say that people cannot say goodbye in ways that satisfy their personal, cultural or religious practices; the available copy contains no article body beyond the abstract. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johns, L., Blackburn, P., & McAuliffe, D.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District (AU)
Corresponding author
Johns, Lise
Venue
International Social Work
Published
2020-07-23
Volume
63
Issue
5
Pages
660-664
ISSN
  • 0020-8728 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7234
OpenAlex
W3045409622
Cited by
43
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Social Work (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, prolonged grief disorder, bereavement, grief, social work, death and dying, funeral restrictions, pandemic impact on families

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review