The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a Structural Understanding of Coup Risk
Abstract
Although coup risk plays an important role in theories of war, revolution, and democratization, scholars have not developed a rigorous conceptualization and valid measure of the concept. We develop a structural understanding of coup risk as distinct from proximate causes of coups as well as coup-proofing strategies that regimes implement to avert coups. Theoretical insights into factors that predispose regimes toward coup vulnerability provide the groundwork for an improved measure based on strength of civil society, legitimacy, and past coups. Cross-national statistical analyses are used to significantly improve on previous coupincidence models and highlight deficiencies of the common approach to measuring coup risk. The structural conceptualization of coup risk enhances understanding of broader civil-military dynamics, in particular the well-known distinction between motives and opportunities for launching coups. This distinction is shown to be insensitive to an important observational equivalence: that coups may be rare in both high-and low-risk cases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Political Order in Changing Societies
Huntington, S. P. (1970) · Verfassung in Recht und Übersee · doi:10.5771/0506-7286-1970-2-257 · Cited by 6,333
Political Order in Changing Societies.
Zolberg, A. R., & Huntington, S. P. (1969) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2110237 · Cited by 5,753
States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China
Skocpol, T. (1979) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815805 · Cited by 5,408 · cited 1×
“As long as regimes are able to retain the loyalty of the military, revolutionary opponents usually are unable to displace leaders who control the government (Chorley 1943; Gurr 1967, 1970, 251; Russell 1974; Skocpol 1979).”
Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation
Linz, J. (1996) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · doi:10.56021/9780801851575 · Cited by 3,583
(1970) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,500
(1983) · Cited by 3,411
Coller, X., Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40184001 · Cited by 3,028
The Soldier and the State. The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations.
Martineau, D. L., & Huntington, S. P. (1957) · Military Affairs · doi:10.2307/1984529 · Cited by 1,225
States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China
Skocpol, T. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316423998 · Cited by 1,177
Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association
(1917) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1944168 · Cited by 1,064
Cited by
The Politics of Authoritarian Rule
Svolik, M. W. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139176040 · Cited by 2,611
Global instances of coups from 1950 to 2010: A new dataset
Powell, J. M., & Thyne, C. L. (2011) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343310397436 · Cited by 836
Revisiting economic shocks and coups
Kim, N. K. (2016) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002713520531 · Cited by 128
Carey, S. C., & Mitchell, N. J. (2017) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051915-045433 · Cited by 106
The Causes and Outcomes of Coup during Civil War
Bell, C., & Sudduth, J. K. (2017) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002715603098 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Belkin, A., & Schofer, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 594-620
- ISSN
- 0022-0027 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8766
- OpenAlex
- W2056946959
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 2.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a Structural Understanding of Coup Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022002703258197
- The paper
- Belkin, A., & Schofer, E. (2003). Toward a Structural Understanding of Coup Risk. Journal of Conflict Resolution. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002703258197
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.