The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Double Take: A Reexamination of Democracy and Autocracy in Modern Polities
Abstract
The Polity data are widely used to explore the causes and consequences of democratic authority patterns. These data often have been used uncritically. The authors explore some of the theoretical and empirical characteristics of these data. They show how the analytical composition of the well-known democracy and autocracy scores is not upheld by an empirical analysis of the component measurements and demonstrate that democracy, as measured by the Polity indicators, is fundamentally a reflection of decisional constraints on the chief executive. The recruitment and participation dimensions are shown to be empirically extraneous despite their centrality in democratic theory. The authors conclude that it is a mistake to overlook the categorical nature of these data and that an analysis of the constituent authority patterns is likely to be fruitful for the democratic peace and democratization literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data
Kass, G. V. (1980) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2986296 · Cited by 2,880
Cited by
A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800–2007
Boix, C., Miller, M., & Rosato, S. (2013) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414012463905 · Cited by 1,072
Respect for Human Rights has Improved Over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability
FARISS, C. J. (2014) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055414000070 · Cited by 706
Democracy as a Latent Variable
Treier, S., & Jackman, S. (2008) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00308.x · Cited by 680
Democracy and the Violation of Human Rights: A Statistical Analysis from 1976 to 1996
Davenport, C., & Armstrong, D. A. (2004) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00086.x · Cited by 652
The Effect of Political Regime on Civil War: Unpacking Anocracy
Vreeland, J. R. (2008) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002708315594 · Cited by 562
Metadata
- Authors
- Gleditsch, K. S., & Ward, M. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 361-383
- ISSN
- 0022-0027 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8766
- OpenAlex
- W2063489210
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 47.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Double Take: A Reexamination of Democracy and Autocracy in Modern Polities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022002797041003002
- The paper
- Gleditsch, K. S., & Ward, M. D. (1997). Double Take: A Reexamination of Democracy and Autocracy in Modern Polities. Journal of Conflict Resolution. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002797041003002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.