Cited by 652Political Conflict and GovernancePolitical Theory and DemocracyMemory, violence, and history

Democracy and the Violation of Human Rights: A Statistical Analysis from 1976 to 1996

Davenport, Christian, Armstrong, David A.·2004·American Journal of Political Science

Abstract

Most studies posit and identify a linear and negative relationship between democracy and the violation of human rights. Some research challenges this finding, however, suggesting that nonlinear influences exist. Within this article, we examine the structure of the relationship between democracy and repression during the time period from 1976 to 1996. To conduct our analysis, we utilize diverse statistical approaches which are particularly flexible in identifying influences that take a variety of functional forms (specifically LOESS and binary decomposition). Across measures and methodological techniques, we found that below a certain level, democracy has no impact on human rights violations, but above this level democracy influences repression in a negative and roughly linear manner. The implications of this research are discussed within the conclusion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00086.x

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Democracies and anocracies have long histories of repressive action.

    “Likewise, some see democratic uses of digital repression as evidence that authoritarian practices are spreading to non-autocracies (75), but democracies and anocracies have long histories of repressive action (170, 171).”

    From Physical and virtual repertoires of contention (2022) · cites this paper as [170]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davenport, C., & Armstrong, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Davenport, Christian
Venue
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06-08
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
538-554
ISSN
  • 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5907
OpenAlex
W2143395739
Cited by
652
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 30
FWCI
48.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Memory, violence, and history
Keywords
democracy, human rights violations, political repression, nonlinear effects, loess, binary decomposition, authoritarianism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review