Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 493

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Culture-Level Dimensions of Social Axioms and Their Correlates across 41 Cultures

Open access
Bond, Michael Harris, Leung, Kwok, Au, Al, Tong, Kwok-Kit, de Carrasquel, Sharon Reimel, Murakami, Fumio, Yamaguchi, Susumu, Bierbrauer, Günter, Singelis, Theodore M., Broer, Markus, Boen, Filip, Lambert, Sophie M., Ferreira, Maria Cristina, Noels, Kimberly A., van Bavel, Jay, Safdar, Saba, Zhang, Jianxin, Chen, Lina, Solcova, Iva, Stetovska, Iva, Niit, Toomas, Niit, Kaisa-Kitri, Hurme, Helena, Böling, Mia, Franchi, Vijé, Magradze, Guguli, Javakhishvili, Nino, Boehnke, Klaus, Klinger, Edgar, Huang, Xu, Fulop, Marta, Berkics, Mihaly, Panagiotopoulou, Penny, Sriram, Sujata, Chaudhary, Nandita, Ghosh, Anjali, Vohra, Neharika, Iqbal, Dien Fakhri, Kurman, Jenny, Thein, Ram David, Comunian, Anna Laura, Ae, Son, Kyung, Austers, Ivars, Harb, Charles, Odusanya, Joseph O. T., Ahmed, Zainal A., Ismail, Rosnah, van deVijver, Fons, Ward, Colleen, Mogaji, Andrew, Sam, David Lackland, Khan, Muhammad Jahan Zeb, Cabanillas, William E., Sycip, Ly, Neto, Félix, Cabecinhas, Rosa, Xavier, Paulo, Dinca, Margareta, Lebedeva, Nadezhda, Viskochil, Andrianna, Ponomareva, Oksana, Burgess, Steven Michael, Oceja, Luis, Campo, Silvia, Hwang, Kwang-Kuo, D’souza, June Bernadette, Ataca, Bilge, Furnham, Adrian, Lewis, J. Rees·2004·Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
DOI 10.1177/0022022104268388
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Leung and colleagues have revealed a five-dimensional structure of social axioms across individuals from five cultural groups. The present research was designed to reveal the culture level factor structure of social axioms and its correlates across 41 nations. An ecological factor analysis on the 60 items of the Social Axioms Survey extracted two factors: Dynamic Externality correlates with value measures tapping collectivism, hierarchy, and conservatism and with national indices indicative of lower social development. Societal Cynicism is less strongly and broadly correlated with previous values measures or other national indices and seems to define a novel cultural syndrome. Its national correlates suggest that it taps the cognitive component of a cultural constellation labeled maleficence, a cultural syndrome associated with a general mistrust of social systems and other people. Discussion focused on the meaning of these national level factors of beliefs and on their relationships with individual level factors of belief derived from the same data set.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022022104268388

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bond, M. H., Leung, K., Au, A., Tong, K.-K., de Carrasquel, S. R., Murakami, F., Yamaguchi, S., Bierbrauer, G., Singelis, T. M., Broer, M., Boen, F., Lambert, S. M., Ferreira, M. C., Noels, K. A., van Bavel, J., Safdar, S., Zhang, J., Chen, L., Solcova, I., Stetovska, I., Niit, T., Niit, K.-K., Hurme, H., Böling, M., Franchi, V., Magradze, G., Javakhishvili, N., Boehnke, K., Klinger, E., Huang, X., Fulop, M., Berkics, M., Panagiotopoulou, P., Sriram, S., Chaudhary, N., Ghosh, A., Vohra, N., Iqbal, D. F., Kurman, J., Thein, R. D., Comunian, A. L., Ae, S., Austers, I., Harb, C., Odusanya, J. O. T., Ahmed, Z. A., Ismail, R., van deVijver, F., Ward, C., Mogaji, A., Sam, D. L., Khan, M. J. Z., Cabanillas, W. E., Sycip, L., Neto, F., Cabecinhas, R., Xavier, P., Dinca, M., Lebedeva, N., Viskochil, A., Ponomareva, O., Burgess, S. M., Oceja, L., Campo, S., Hwang, K.-K., D’souza, J. B., Ataca, B., Furnham, A., & Lewis, J. R.
Venue
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2004-09
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
548-570
ISSN
  • 0022-0221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5422
DOI
10.1177/0022022104268388
OpenAlex
W2096926178
Cited by
493
References
5
FWCI
18.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.