Cited by 83Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchProbiotics and Fermented FoodsDental materials and restorations

Specific Lactobacillus/Mutans Streptococcus Co-aggregation

Lang, C., Böttner, M., Holz, C., Veen, M., Ryser, M., Reindl, A., Pompejus, M., Tanzer, J.M.·2010·Journal of Dental Research

Abstract

Selective interaction of mutans streptococci with benign bacteria could present an opportunity for their removal from the mouth without disruption of other oral flora. This study was conducted to find probiotic lactobacilli that could specifically co-aggregate in vitro with mutans streptococci, but not with other plaque commensals. A search of 624 lactobacilli among a large culture library revealed 6 strains, all classifiable as L. paracasei or L. rhamnosus, which met this criterion. Such novel, specific co-aggregation, however, was not a general characteristic of these species or the genus Lactobacillus. The co-aggregation by these specific lactobacilli was characterized as heat treatment (autoclaving)- and protease-resistant, lectin-independent, not inactivated by sugar substitutes, operational over a wide pH range, unaffected by whole saliva, but calcium-dependent. It is thus seen to present a potential strategy for in vivo alteration of plaque biofilm and caries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022034509356246

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selected bacterial strains belonging to the genera Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium have demonstrated a capacity to aggregate with oral pathogens such as Fusobacterium nucleatum or Streptococcus mutans in vitro and in vivo.

    “Selected bacterial strains belonging to the genera Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium have been applied as probiotics and have demonstrated a capacity to aggregate with oral pathogens, such as Fusobacterium nucleatum or Streptococcus mutans, in vitro [8–10] and in vivo [11].”

    From Coaggregation of oral pathogens by postbiotic lactobacilli (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lang, C., Böttner, M., Holz, C., Veen, M., Ryser, M., Reindl, A., Pompejus, M., & Tanzer, J. M.
Affiliations
  • BASF (Germany) (DE)
  • ORGANOBALANCE GmbH, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, D–13355 Berlin, Germany;
Venue
Journal of Dental Research
Published
2009-12-30
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
175-179
ISSN
  • 0022-0345 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-0591
OpenAlex
W2148070607
Cited by
83
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Dental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
Keywords
Lactobacillus, mutans streptococci, probiotics, Lactobacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, dental plaque, dental caries, calcium-dependent adhesion, oral commensals
MeSH terms
Adult, Bacterial Adhesion, Dental Plaque, Hot Temperature, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Lactobacillus, Peptide Hydrolases, Saliva, Streptococcus mutans, Sucrose, Biofilms, Probiotics, Microbial Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review