Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Systematic Review on Noninvasive Treatment of Root Caries Lesions

Wierichs, R.J., Meyer-Lueckel, H.·2015·Journal of Dental Research

Abstract

The present systematic review critically summarizes results of clinical studies investigating chemical agents to reduce initiation or inactivation of root caries lesions (RCLs). Outcomes were DMFRS/DFRS (decayed, missing, filled root surfaces), surface texture (hard/soft), and/or RCI (root caries index). Three electronic databases were screened for studies from 1947 to 2014. Cross-referencing was used to further identify articles. Article selection and data abstraction were done in duplicate. Languages were restricted to English and German. Mean differences (MD) were calculated for changes in DMFRS/DFRS. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated for changes in surface texture and RCI in a random effects model. Thirty-four articles with 1 or more agents were included; they reported 30 studies with 10,136 patients who were 20 to 101 y old; and they analyzed 28 chemical agents (alone or in combination). Eleven studies investigated dentifrices, 10 rinses, 8 varnishes, 3 solutions, 3 gels, and 2 ozone applications. Meta-analyses revealed that dentifrices containing 5,000 ppm F - (RR = 0.49; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.42, 0.57; high level of evidence) or 1.5% arginine plus 1,450 ppm F - (RR = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.64, 0.98; very low level) are more effective in inactivating RCLs than dentifrices containing 1,100 to 1,450 ppm F - . Self-applied AmF/SnF 2 -containing dentifrice and rinse decreased the initiation of RCLs when compared with NaF products (standardized MD = 0.15; 95% CI = −0.22, 0.52; low level). Patients rinsing with a mouth rinse containing 225 to 900 ppm F - revealed a significantly reduced DMFRS/DFRS (MD = −0.18; 95% CI = −0.35, −0.01; low level) when compared with a placebo rinse. Significantly reduced RCI was found for CHX (MD = −0.67; 95% CI = −1.01, −0.32; very low level) as well as SDF (MD = −0.33; 95% CI = −0.39, −0.28; very low level) when compared with placebo varnish. Regular use of dentifrices containing 5,000 ppm F - and quarterly professionally applied CHX or SDF varnishes seem to be efficacious to decrease progression and initiation of root caries, respectively. However, this conclusion is based on only very few well-conducted randomized controlled trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022034514557330

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.001 · DOI
  2. Banoczy J, 1991, Proc Finn Dent Soc, 87, 555
  3. 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2000.00067.x · DOI
  4. Baysan A, 2007, Am J Dent, 20, 203
  5. 10.1159/000047429 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2001.290508.x · DOI
  7. 10.1177/00220345860650090801 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/0810767 · DOI
  9. Cohen J, 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  10. 10.12968/denu.2008.35.5.320 · DOI
  11. DePaola PF, 1993, Cariology for the nineties, 25
  12. 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1159/000348581 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1177/0022034512449464 · DOI
  15. Ettinger RL, 1999, Dent Clin North Am, 43, 679, 10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00820-5 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1741-2358.1998.00051.x · DOI
  17. Fure S, 2009, Oral Health Prev Dent, 7, 147
  18. 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2012.00318.x · DOI
  19. 10.1177/154405910408300810 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/sim.1186 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2003.00106.x · DOI
  22. Hu DY, 2013, J Clin Dent, 24, A23
  23. 10.14219/jada.archive.1988.0128 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2001.65.10.tb03464.x · DOI
  25. 10.1177/154405910508400807 · DOI
  26. Mantel N, 1963, J Am Stat Assoc, 58, 690
  27. Marinho VC, 2003, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4, CD002782
  28. Marks RG, 1994, Int Dent J, 44, 275
  29. 10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106401.x · DOI
  30. Nyvad B, 1986, Scand J Dent Res, 94, 281
  31. 10.1093/ejo/cji075 · DOI
  32. 10.1902/jop.2007.060479 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2007.00199.x · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2004.00593.x · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.cden.2010.03.005 · DOI
  36. Petersson LG, 2007, Am J Dent, 20, 93
  37. 10.3109/00016357.2011.568962 · DOI
  38. 10.1159/000016531 · DOI
  39. 10.1159/000261486 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1741-2358.1987.tb00289.x · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00381.x · DOI
  42. 10.1177/00220345910700021101 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.04.006 · DOI
  44. 10.1111/cdoe.12090 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.04.005 · DOI
  46. 10.1159/000080584 · DOI
  47. 10.1177/0022034510375825 · DOI
  48. 10.1159/000077758 · DOI
  49. Vered Y, 2009, J Clin Dent, 20, 62
  50. 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1993.tb02691.x · DOI
  51. 10.1177/0022034512453590 · DOI
  52. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00176.x · DOI
  53. 10.1159/000098041 · DOI
  54. 10.1177/0022034509338671 · DOI
  55. Yin W, 2013, J Clin Dent, 24, A15
  56. 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.04.004 · DOI
  57. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00392.x · DOI
  58. 10.1159/000346620 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.002 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
Wierichs, R. J., & Meyer-Lueckel, H.
Affiliations
Department of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
Venue
Journal of Dental Research
Published
2014-11-14
Volume
94
Issue
2
Pages
261-271
ISSN
  • 0022-0345
  • 1544-0591
Cited by
172
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic Review on Noninvasive Treatment of Root Caries Lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022034514557330
The paper
Wierichs, R. J., & Meyer-Lueckel, H. (2015). Systematic Review on Noninvasive Treatment of Root Caries Lesions. Journal of Dental Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514557330