The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Review on Noninvasive Treatment of Root Caries Lesions
Abstract
The present systematic review critically summarizes results of clinical studies investigating chemical agents to reduce initiation or inactivation of root caries lesions (RCLs). Outcomes were DMFRS/DFRS (decayed, missing, filled root surfaces), surface texture (hard/soft), and/or RCI (root caries index). Three electronic databases were screened for studies from 1947 to 2014. Cross-referencing was used to further identify articles. Article selection and data abstraction were done in duplicate. Languages were restricted to English and German. Mean differences (MD) were calculated for changes in DMFRS/DFRS. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated for changes in surface texture and RCI in a random effects model. Thirty-four articles with 1 or more agents were included; they reported 30 studies with 10,136 patients who were 20 to 101 y old; and they analyzed 28 chemical agents (alone or in combination). Eleven studies investigated dentifrices, 10 rinses, 8 varnishes, 3 solutions, 3 gels, and 2 ozone applications. Meta-analyses revealed that dentifrices containing 5,000 ppm F - (RR = 0.49; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.42, 0.57; high level of evidence) or 1.5% arginine plus 1,450 ppm F - (RR = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.64, 0.98; very low level) are more effective in inactivating RCLs than dentifrices containing 1,100 to 1,450 ppm F - . Self-applied AmF/SnF 2 -containing dentifrice and rinse decreased the initiation of RCLs when compared with NaF products (standardized MD = 0.15; 95% CI = −0.22, 0.52; low level). Patients rinsing with a mouth rinse containing 225 to 900 ppm F - revealed a significantly reduced DMFRS/DFRS (MD = −0.18; 95% CI = −0.35, −0.01; low level) when compared with a placebo rinse. Significantly reduced RCI was found for CHX (MD = −0.67; 95% CI = −1.01, −0.32; very low level) as well as SDF (MD = −0.33; 95% CI = −0.39, −0.28; very low level) when compared with placebo varnish. Regular use of dentifrices containing 5,000 ppm F - and quarterly professionally applied CHX or SDF varnishes seem to be efficacious to decrease progression and initiation of root caries, respectively. However, this conclusion is based on only very few well-conducted randomized controlled trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Fluoride is still the main strategy for non-invasive control of root caries [11].”
From Validation of a Cariogenic Biofilm Model to Evaluate the Effect of Fluoride on Enamel and Root Dentine Demineralization (2016) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
Research works printed but not linked: 59
- 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.001 · DOI
- Banoczy J, 1991, Proc Finn Dent Soc, 87, 555
- 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2000.00067.x · DOI
- Baysan A, 2007, Am J Dent, 20, 203
- 10.1159/000047429 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2001.290508.x · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345860650090801 · DOI
- 10.1177/0810767 · DOI
- Cohen J, 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
- 10.12968/denu.2008.35.5.320 · DOI
- DePaola PF, 1993, Cariology for the nineties, 25
- 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000348581 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0022034512449464 · DOI
- Ettinger RL, 1999, Dent Clin North Am, 43, 679, 10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00820-5 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1741-2358.1998.00051.x · DOI
- Fure S, 2009, Oral Health Prev Dent, 7, 147
- 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2012.00318.x · DOI
- 10.1177/154405910408300810 · DOI
- 10.1002/sim.1186 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2003.00106.x · DOI
- Hu DY, 2013, J Clin Dent, 24, A23
- 10.14219/jada.archive.1988.0128 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2001.65.10.tb03464.x · DOI
- 10.1177/154405910508400807 · DOI
- Mantel N, 1963, J Am Stat Assoc, 58, 690
- Marinho VC, 2003, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4, CD002782
- Marks RG, 1994, Int Dent J, 44, 275
- 10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106401.x · DOI
- Nyvad B, 1986, Scand J Dent Res, 94, 281
- 10.1093/ejo/cji075 · DOI
- 10.1902/jop.2007.060479 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2007.00199.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2004.00593.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cden.2010.03.005 · DOI
- Petersson LG, 2007, Am J Dent, 20, 93
- 10.3109/00016357.2011.568962 · DOI
- 10.1159/000016531 · DOI
- 10.1159/000261486 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1741-2358.1987.tb00289.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00381.x · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345910700021101 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.04.006 · DOI
- 10.1111/cdoe.12090 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.04.005 · DOI
- 10.1159/000080584 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022034510375825 · DOI
- 10.1159/000077758 · DOI
- Vered Y, 2009, J Clin Dent, 20, 62
- 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1993.tb02691.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0022034512453590 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00176.x · DOI
- 10.1159/000098041 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022034509338671 · DOI
- Yin W, 2013, J Clin Dent, 24, A15
- 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.04.004 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00392.x · DOI
- 10.1159/000346620 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.002 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pitts, N. B., Zero, D. T., Marsh, P. D., Ekstrand, K., Weintraub, J. A., Ramos-Gomez, F., Tagami, J., Twetman, S., Tsakos, G., & Ismail, A. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.30 · Cited by 1,823
Evidence-based dentistry update on silver diamine fluoride
Crystal, Y. O., & Niederman, R. (2019) · Dental Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.cden.2018.08.011 · Cited by 253
Silver diamine fluoride for managing carious lesions: an umbrella review
Seifo, N., Cassie, H., Radford, J. R., & Innes, N. P. T. (2019) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-019-0830-5 · Cited by 217
Fernández, C. E., Tenuta, L. M. A., & Cury, J. A. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146478 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Wierichs, R. J., & Meyer-Lueckel, H.
- Affiliations
- Department of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-11-14
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 261-271
- ISSN
- 0022-0345
- 1544-0591
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic Review on Noninvasive Treatment of Root Caries Lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022034514557330
- The paper
- Wierichs, R. J., & Meyer-Lueckel, H. (2015). Systematic Review on Noninvasive Treatment of Root Caries Lesions. Journal of Dental Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514557330