Cited by 55Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation StudiesHealth disparities and outcomesEnvironmental Justice and Health Disparities

Seven years later: Effects of a neighborhood mobility program on poor Black and Latino adults’ well-being

Open access
Fauth, Rebecca C., Leventhal, Tama, Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne·2008·Journal of Health and Social Behavior

Abstract

This study explored program effects on adults' well-being seven years following the implementation of a court-ordered neighborhood mobility program. Low-income black and Latino adults residing in poor, segregated neighborhoods in Yonkers, New York were randomly selected to relocate to publicly funded town-houses in middle-class neighborhoods within the city. Adults who moved (n = 141) and demographically similar adults who were not selected to move (n = 106) were interviewed. Data indicate that 85 percent of adults who moved to the new housing remained there at follow-up. Results revealed that adults who moved resided in neighborhoods with higher collective efficacy and less disorder and danger, but had fewer neighborhood social ties than adults who stayed in poor neighborhoods. Movers were also more likely to work and less likely to receive welfare than nonmovers. Adults who remained in low-poverty neighborhoods at the time of the follow-up reported better physical health than adults residing in poor neighborhoods, but mental health did not vary by neighborhood.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002214650804900201

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Yonkers Housing Intervention, movers had weaker social ties in their new neighborhoods and smaller networks of neighborhood-based friends compared to poor residents who did not move.

    “in the Yonkers Housing Intervention, compared to poor residents who did not move, movers had weaker social ties in their new neighborhoods and smaller networks of neighborhood-based friends [56].”
  • Moving poor residents out of their neighborhood disrupted their social networks.

    “Research also reveals that moving poor residents out of their neighborhood disrupted their social networks.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Briggs Xavier de Souza. A Report to the Ford Foundation. New York: Teachers College; 1997. Yonkers Revisited: The Early Impacts of Scattered-site Public Housing on Families and Neighborhoods. [Google Scholar]
  2. Leventhal Tama, Brooks-Gunn Jeanne. The Early Impacts of Moving to Opportunity on Children and Youth. In: Goering J, Feins JD, editors. Choosing a Better Life? Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity Social Experiment. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press; 2003a. pp. 213–43. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ludwig Jens, Liebman Jeffrey B, Kling Jeffrey R, Duncan Greg J, Katz Lawrence F, Kessler Ronald C, Sanbonmatsu Lisa. What Can We Learn about Neighborhood Effects from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment? A Comment on Clampet-Lundquist and Massey. American Journal of Sociology Forthcoming. [Google Scholar]
  4. Orr Larry, Feins Judith D, Jacob Robin, Beecroft Erik, Sanbonmatsu Lisa, Katz Lawrence F, Liebman Jeffrey B, Kling Jeffrey R. Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Interim Impacts Evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Research and Development; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rickels Karl, Garcia Celso Ramon, Lipman Ronald S, Derogatis Leonard R, Fisher Ellen L. Hopkins Symptom Checklist: Assessing Emotional Distress in Obstetric-gynecologic Practice. Primary Care. 1976;3:751–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wilson William Julius. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Innercity, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1987. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fauth, R. C., Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J.
Affiliations
  • The Work Foundation (GB)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Jeanne Brooks-Gunn is the Virginia and Leonard Marx Professor of Child Development at Teachers College and the College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University. A developmental psychologist, she co-directs the National Center for Children and Families.
Corresponding author
Fauth, Rebecca C.
Venue
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Published
2008-06
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
119-130
ISSN
  • 0022-1465 (ISSN-L)
  • 2150-6000
OpenAlex
W2131679498
Cited by
55
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Health and Social Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD047879, R01HD036387)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
Keywords
neighborhood mobility, low-income adults, Black people, Latino adults, residential segregation, collective efficacy, neighborhood disorder, neighborhood social ties, residential mobility, welfare receipt, employment, physical health, mental health, Yonkers
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, New York City, Personal Satisfaction, Population Dynamics, Poverty, Public Housing, Residence Characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review