Cited by 109Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation StudiesCrime Patterns and InterventionsSchool Choice and Performance

Welcome to the neighborhood? Long-term impacts of moving to low-poverty neighborhoods on poor children’s and adolescents’ outcomes

Open access
Fauth, Rebecca C., Leventhal, Tama, Brooks‐Gunn, Jeanne·2007·Journal of Research on Adolescence

Abstract

This study examined 7‐year follow‐up data from the Yonkers Project, a study of a 1985 court‐ordered neighborhood desegregation program in Yonkers, NY. Low‐income Black and Latino families residing in impoverished neighborhoods who were randomly selected to relocate to publicly funded townhouses in middle‐class communities and demographically similar families who were not selected to move were interviewed. Self‐ and parent‐report data on 8–18‐year‐old children and youth's educational outcomes, problem behavior, and parent–child relations were examined (N=221). Youth 15–18 years of age who relocated to more advantaged neighborhoods reported lower school performance and more hyperactive behavior problems and substance use than peers who remained in impoverished neighborhoods. Program effects on parenting also emerged, with mover parents reporting less stringent monitoring and harsh disciplinary techniques than stayers. Family economic resources and neighborhood conditions, assessed approximately 5 years before, accounted for some of the program effects at 7 years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00522.x

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Moving poor residents from high-poverty neighborhoods to lower-poverty residential areas can produce benefits and negative effects simultaneously.

    “Research also indicates that the benefits of moving poor residents from high-poverty neighborhood environments to lower poverty residential areas can co-occur with negative effects.”
  • In the Yonkers Housing Intervention and the Moving to Opportunity project, adverse educational and behavioral outcomes were observed among teenagers who were older at the time of the initial move.

    “in both the Yonkers Housing Intervention [54] and Moving to Opportunity project [55], adverse educational and behavioral outcomes were observed among the teenagers who were older at the time of the initial move.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fauth, R. C., Leventhal, T., & Brooks‐Gunn, J.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Fauth, Rebecca C.
Venue
Journal of Research on Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-05
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
249-284
ISSN
  • 1050-8392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7795
OpenAlex
W2113781340
Cited by
109
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
22.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Research on Adolescence (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Ford Foundation
  • Spencer Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
educational outcomes, academic performance, adolescent substance use, parenting, parent-child relationship, harsh discipline, family economic resources, neighborhood conditions, long-term outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review