Cited by 32Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth disparities and outcomes

Physician Cognitive Processing as a Source of Diagnostic and Treatment Disparities in Coronary Heart Disease: Results of a Factorial Priming Experiment

Open access
Lutfey, Karen E., Eva, Kevin W., Gerstenberger, Eric, Link, Carol L., McKinlay, John B.·2010·Journal of Health and Social Behavior

Abstract

Literature on health disparities documents variations in clinical decision-making across patient characteristics, physician attributes, and among health care systems. Using data from a vignette-based factorial experiment of 256 primary care providers, we examine the cognitive basis of disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD). We explore whether previously observed disparities are due to physicians (1) not fully considering CHD for certain patients or (2) considering CHD but then discounting it. Half of the physicians in the experiment were primed with explicit directions to consider a CHD diagnosis, and half were not. Relative to their unprimed counterparts, primed physicians were more likely to order CHD-related tests and prescriptions. However, the main effects for patient gender and age remained, suggesting that physicians treated these demographic variables as diagnostic features indicating lower risk of CHD for these patients. This finding suggests that physician appeals to perceived base rates have the potential to contribute to the further reification of socially constructed health statistics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022146509361193

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many assumption studies attempted to make their vignettes as realistic as possible by having them validated by clinicians and by having participants view/read the vignettes as part of a normal day at work.

    “many of the assumption studies attempted to make their vignettes as realistic as possible by having them validated by clinicians [25–41] and also by having participants view/read the vignettes as part of a normal day at work [27–36, 39, 41].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Brooks Lee R Neisser U 1987 Decentralised Control in Categorisation: The Role of Prior Processing Episodes 141 74 Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorisation Cambridge Cambridge University Press
  2. Institute of Medicine 2003 Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Healthcare Washington, D.C The National Academies Press 25032386
  3. Jacoby Larry L Baker John G Brooks Lee R 1989 The Priority of the Specific: Episodic Effects in Picture Identification Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15 275 81 2522516

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lutfey, K. E., Eva, K. W., Gerstenberger, E., Link, C. L., & McKinlay, J. B.
Affiliations
  • New England Research Institutes (US)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Lutfey, Karen E.
Venue
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Published
2010-03
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
16-29
ISSN
  • 0022-1465 (ISSN-L)
  • 2150-6000
OpenAlex
W2114789700
Cited by
32
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Health and Social Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL079174)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
coronary artery disease, health disparities, diagnostic disparities, treatment disparities, primary care providers, base rates, gender bias, age bias, diagnostic bias, vignette experiment
MeSH terms
Cognition, Coronary Disease, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Physicians, Videotape Recording, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review