CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 138Reading and Literacy DevelopmentWriting and Handwriting EducationBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Synthesis of Spelling and Reading Interventions and Their Effects on the Spelling Outcomes of Students With LD

Wanzek, Jeanne, Vaughn, Sharon, Wexler, Jade, Swanson, Elizabeth A., Edmonds, Meghan, Kim, Ae-Hwa·2006·Journal of Learning Disabilities
DOI 10.1177/00222194060390060501
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Previous research studies examining the effects of spelling and reading interventions on the spelling outcomes of students with learning disabilities (LD) are synthesized. An extensive search of the professional literature between 1995 and 2003 yielded a total of 19 intervention studies that provided spelling and reading interventions to students with LD and measured spelling outcomes. Findings revealed that spelling outcomes were consistently improved following spelling interventions that included explicit instruction with multiple practice opportunities and immediate corrective feedback after the word was misspelled. Furthermore, evidence from spelling interventions that employed assistive technology aimed at spelling in written compositions indicated positive effects on spelling outcomes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00222194060390060501

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Bear, D.R., 1998, The Reading Teacher, 52, 222
  2. Darch, C., 2000, Psychology, 27, 15
  3. Gordon, J., 1993, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 175
  4. Grskovic, J.A., 1996, Education, 6, 343
  5. Herrera, J.A., 1997, Reading Improvement, 34, 71
  6. Institute of Education Sciences., 2003, What Works Clearinghouse study review standards
  7. Keel, M.C., 2001, Education & Treatment of Children, 24, 4
  8. Lewis, R.B., 1998, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 95
  9. McNaughton, D., 1997, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 16
  10. Morton, W.L., 1998, Education, 8, 321
  11. 10.1037/0022-0663.74.2.166 · DOI
  12. Swanson, H.L., 1999, Interventions for students with learning disabilities
  13. Telecsan, B.L., 1999, Education, 9, 133

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–138 of 138

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Swanson, E. A., Edmonds, M., & Kim, A.-H.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Dankook University (KR)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2006-11
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
528-543
ISSN
  • 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4780
DOI
10.1177/00222194060390060501
OpenAlex
W1980675100
Cited by
138
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
spelling intervention, reading intervention, learning disabilities, explicit instruction, corrective feedback, assistive technology, composition writing, special education
MeSH terms
Child, Dyslexia, Feedback, Humans, Learning Disabilities, Teaching, Verbal Behavior, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review