Cited by 33Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Abilities and Testing

Learning and Memory Impairments in Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Andersen, Per N., Egeland, Jens, Øie, Merete·2013·Journal of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

There are relatively few studies on learning and delayed memory with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The objective of the present study was to examine acquisition, free delayed memory, and recognition skills in medication naive children and adolescents aged 8-16 years with ADHD combined subtype (36 participants) and inattentive subtype (45) compared to 50 healthy controls (HC) aged 8-17 years. Learning and delayed memory were assessed with the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised, which have compatible methods of administration, test format, and score ranges. The results showed that children with both ADHD subtypes scored significantly below HC in acquisition, free delayed memory, and recognition, even when controlling for the effect of IQ. Comparing phases in the learning process showed an initial deficit in acquisition but no increase in effect size in subsequent testing of free delayed memory or recognition. The study indicates that learning and delayed memory processes are impaired in both combined and inattentive subtypes of ADHD and that the deficits are not merely an artifact of IQ. The study indicates that emphasis must be put on the acquisition phase and how students with ADHD organize and encode new information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022219412437040

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersen, P. N., Egeland, J., & Øie, M.
Affiliations
  • Lillehammer University College (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Innlandet Hospital Trust (NO)
Venue
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Published
2012-03-05
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
453-460
ISSN
  • 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4780
OpenAlex
W2110567528
Cited by
33
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, learning disabilities, delayed memory, verbal learning, visuospatial memory, recognition memory, acquisition phase, inattentive subtype, combined subtype, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aptitude Tests, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Learning Disabilities, Male, Memory Disorders, Psychological Tests, Wechsler Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review