The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marketing Agility: The Concept, Antecedents, and a Research Agenda
Open accessAbstract
Changes in the way customers shop, accompanied by an explosion of customer touchpoints and fast-changing competitive and technological dynamics, have led to an increased emphasis on agile marketing. The objective of this article is to conceptualize and investigate the emerging concept of marketing agility. The authors synthesize the literature from marketing and allied disciplines and insights from in-depth interviews with 22 senior managers. Marketing agility is defined as the extent to which an entity rapidly iterates between making sense of the market and executing marketing decisions to adapt to the market. It is conceptualized as occurring across different organizational levels and shown to be distinct from related concepts in marketing and allied fields. The authors highlight the firm challenges in executing marketing agility, including ensuring brand consistency, scaling agility across the marketing ecosystem, managing data privacy concerns, pursuing marketing agility as a fad, and hiring marketing leaders. The authors identify the antecedents of marketing agility at the organizational, team, marketing leadership, and employee levels and provide a roadmap for future research. The authors caution that marketing agility may not be well-suited for all firms and all marketing activities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507
The spread of true and false news online
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 · Cited by 8,847 · cited 1×
“Marketing responses to false brand stories or rumors need to be swift, as false news tends to propagate faster in a digital world due to its greater perceived novelty (Vosoughi, Roy, and Aral 2018).”
BackgroundValidation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 · Cited by 6,404
Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0420 · Cited by 5,765
Understanding dynamic capabilities
Winter, S. G. (2003) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.318 · Cited by 5,315
Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299806200303 · Cited by 3,971
Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err.
Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000033 · Cited by 3,232
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00160 · Cited by 2,356
Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379202900303 · Cited by 1,901
Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2014.873177 · Cited by 1,764
Marketing Analytics for Data-Rich Environments
Wedel, M., & Kannan, P. K. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0413 · Cited by 1,261
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
Closing the Marketing Capabilities Gap
Day, G. S. (2011) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.75.4.183 · Cited by 1,079
Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis.
Isenberg, D. J. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141 · Cited by 1,044
Data Privacy: Effects on Customer and Firm Performance
Martin, K. D., Borah, A., & Palmatier, R. W. (2017) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0497 · Cited by 786 · cited 1×
“The financial impact of data breaches is severe (Martin, Borah, and Palmatier 2017).”
BackgroundThe Dynamics of Strategic Agility: Nokia's Rollercoaster Experience
Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2008) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41166447 · Cited by 412 · cited 2×
“Finally, senior leaders should have the ability to reconfigure capabilities and redeploy resources rapidly (Doz and Kosonen 2008).”
BackgroundMan Versus Machine: Resisting Automation in Identity-Based Consumer Behavior
Leung, E., Paolacci, G., & Puntoni, S. (2018) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/0022243718818423 · Cited by 285
Cited by
Mobile payment adoption in Latin America
Bailey, A. A., Bonifield, C. M., Arias, A., & Villegas, J. (2022) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-04-2021-0130 · Cited by 78
Khairy, H. A., Baquero, A., & Al-Romeedy, B. S. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151914337 · Cited by 61
The Impact of Quality of Big Data Marketing Analytics (BDMA) on the Market and Financial Performance
Haverila, M., Haverila, K. C., Mohiuddin, M., & Su, Z. (2022) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.315646 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalaignanam, K., Tuli, K. R., Kushwaha, T., Lee, L., & Gal, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-09-14
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-58
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W3086813946
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 34.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.