The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-Term Manufacturer-Supplier Relationships: Do They Pay off for Supplier Firms?
Abstract
Recently, there has been a growing trend toward long-term relationships between manufacturers and their suppliers. Although much as been written about the benefits of this shift to manufacturers, little is known about the benefits to supplier firms. In this study, we empirically assess the impact of long-term relationships with specific customers on the performance of supplier firms using cross-sectional and longitudinal information available in the Compustat collection of data bases and the Compact Disclosure data base. Our results indicate that maintaining long-term relationships with select customers does not come at the expense of the rate of sales growth. Suppliers in long-term relationships are able to achieve the same level of growth as firms that employ a transactional approach to servicing their customers. These suppliers are able to reduce costs over time through better inventory utilization; however, this reduction in cost seems to be bargained away by their customers through lower prices over time. Finally, the supplier firms in long-term relationships achieve higher profitability by differentially reducing their discretionary expenses such as selling, general, and administrative overhead costs to a greater extent than their counterparts who use a transactional approach to servicing their customers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Developing buyer-seller relationships
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298705100202 · Cited by 9,139
Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Ganesan, S. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800201 · Cited by 6,741
Price, Authority, and Trust: From Ideal Types to Plural Forms
Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. (1989) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.15.080189.000525 · Cited by 1,990
Cited by
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250983 · Cited by 5,042
Investments in Consumer Relationships: A Cross-Country and Cross-Industry Exploration
De Wulf, K., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Iacobucci, D. (2001) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.4.33.18386 · Cited by 2,083
The Role of Relational Information Processes and Technology Use in Customer Relationship Management
Jayachandran, S., Sharma, S., Kaufman, P., & Raman, P. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.177 · Cited by 966
Bolton, R. N., Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2004) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070304263341 · Cited by 741
Antecedents of supply chain visibility in retail supply chains: A resource‐based theory perspective
Barratt, M., & Oke, A. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.003 · Cited by 702
Krasnikov, A., & Jayachandran, S. (2008) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.72.4.001 · Cited by 823
Cheung, M., Myers, M. B., & Mentzer, J. T. (2011) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.926 · Cited by 204
Willing to Pay More, Eager to Pay Less: The Role of Customer Loyalty in Price Negotiations
Wieseke, J., Alavi, S., & Habel, J. (2014) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.13.0104 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalwani, M. U., & Narayandas, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W1985931376
- Cited by
- 1,476
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 49.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.