The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions
Abstract
A laboratory experiment examines factors affecting evaluations of proposed extensions from a core brand that has or has not already been extended into other product categories. Specifically, the perceived quality of the core brand and the number, success, and similarity of intervening brand extensions, by influencing perceptions of company credibility and product fit, are hypothesized to affect evaluations of proposed new extensions, as well as evaluations of the core brand itself. The findings indicate that evaluations of a proposed extension when there were intervening extensions differed from evaluations when there were no intervening extensions only when there was a significant disparity between the perceived quality of the intervening extension (as judged by its success or failure) and the perceived quality of the core brand. A successful intervening extension increased evaluations of a proposed extension only for an average quality core brand; an unsuccessful intervening extension decreased evaluations of a proposed extension only for a high quality core brand. Though a successful intervening extension also increased evaluations of an average quality core brand, an unsuccessful intervening extension did not decrease core brand evaluations regardless of the quality level of the core brand. The relative similarity of intervening extensions had little differential impact, but multiple intervening extensions had some different effects than a single intervening extension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility
Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838 · Cited by 4,659
The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses
Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252190 · Cited by 4,197
Measuring Attitude toward the Brand and Purchase Intentions
Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004) · Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising · doi:10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164 · Cited by 1,812
Corporate identity: the concept, its measurement and management
Riel, C. B. M. V., & Balmer, J. M. T. (1997) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090569710167574 · Cited by 868
A Survey-Based Method for Measuring and Understanding Brand Equity and Its Extendibility
Park, C. S., & Srinivasan, V. (1994) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379403100210 · Cited by 446
Alcañiz, E. B., Cáceres, R. C., & Pérez, R. C. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0461-x · Cited by 291
Hinsch, C., Felix, R., & Rauschnabel, P. A. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101987 · Cited by 279
Consumer behavior in sustainable fashion: A systematic literature review and future research agenda
Busalim, A., Fox, G., & Lynn, T. (2022) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12794 · Cited by 197
Cross-buying in retailing: Drivers and consequences
KUMAR, V, GEORGE, M., & PANCRAS, J. (2008) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2008.01.007 · Cited by 184
P300 and categorization in brand extension
Ma, Q., Wang, X., Shu, L., & Dai, S. (2008) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2007.11.022 · Cited by 109
Tsai, W., & Yang, I. W. (2010) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00488.x · Cited by 108
Customer Referral Reward–Brand–Fit: A Schema Congruity Perspective
Stumpf, C., & Baum, M. (2016) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20896 · Cited by 40
Looking forward, looking back: developing a narrative of the past, present and future of a brand
Keller, K. L. (2023) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/s41262-022-00309-2 · Cited by 38
Self-citationHusain, R., Ratna, V. V., & Saxena, A. (2023) · Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management · doi:10.1080/19368623.2023.2232382 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Keller, K. L., & Aaker, D. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-50
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W1983279047
- Cited by
- 1,280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 48.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.