Cited by 295Political Conflict and GovernancePeacebuilding and International SecurityNatural Resources and Economic Development

Poverty and Violent Conflict: A Micro-Level Perspective on the Causes and Duration of Warfare

Open access
Justino, Patricia·2009·Journal of Peace Research

Abstract

This article discusses how endogenous mechanisms linking processes of violent conflict and the economic well-being of individuals and households in combat areas provide valuable micro foundations to the ongoing debate on the causes and duration of armed conflict. Notably, the endogenous relationship between conflict processes and household economic status leads to the emergence of symbiotic associations between armed groups and households living in areas they control that affect substantially the probability of a conflict starting and its effectiveness thereafter. Households in conflict areas draw on local armed groups to protect their economic status when anticipating violence and during the conflict, while armed groups make use of different levels of (either reluctant or voluntary) participation, support and cooperation from local populations to advance their strategic objectives at the onset and throughout the conflict. The level of household participation at the start and during the conflict is a function of two interdependent variables, namely household vulnerability to poverty and household vulnerability to violence. The poorer the household is at the start of the conflict, the higher is the probability of the household participating and supporting an armed group. The higher the risk of violence, the higher is the probability of the household participating and supporting armed groups. The interaction between these two variables varies with the conflict itself and is defined by the direct and indirect effects of conflict-induced violence on the economic behaviour and decisions of households in combat areas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022343309102655

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The widespread presence of armed actors offers, for some, a viable coping strategy and alternative mode of livelihood.

    “The widespread presence of armed actors offers, for some, a viable coping strategy and alternative mode of livelihood (175).”

    From Vicious Circles: Violence, Vulnerability, and Climate Change (2021) · cites this paper as [175]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Justino, P.
Affiliations
Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University; and Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex
Venue
Journal of Peace Research
Published
2009-05-01
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
315-333
ISSN
  • 0022-3433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3578
OpenAlex
W2147242040
Cited by
295
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 24
FWCI
62.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Peace Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Natural Resources and Economic Development
Keywords
poverty, violent conflict, causes of armed conflict, household welfare, armed groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review