Cited by 480Pharmaceutical industry and healthcarePharmaceutical Economics and PolicyHealth, Medicine and Society

Pharmaceuticalization of Society in Context: Theoretical, Empirical and Health Dimensions

Open access
Abraham, John·2010·Sociology

Abstract

Sociological interest in pharmaceuticals has intensified, heightening awareness of ‘pharmaceuticalization’. It is argued that pharmaceuticalization should be understood by reference to five main biosociological explanatory factors: biomedicalism, medicalization, pharmaceutical industry promotion and marketing, consumerism, and regulatory-state ideology or policy. The biomedicalism thesis, which claims that expansion of drug treatment reflects advances in biomedical science to meet health needs, is found to be a weak explanatory factor because a significant amount of growth in pharmaceuticalization is inconsistent with scientific evidence, and because drug innovations offering significant therapeutic advance have been declining across the sector, including areas of major health need. Some elements of consumerism have undermined pharmaceuticalization, even causing de-pharmaceuticalization in some therapeutic sub-fields. However, other aspects of consumerism, together with industry promotion, medicalization, and deregulatory state policies are found to be drivers of increased pharmaceuticalization in ways that are largely outside, or sub-optimal for, significant therapeutic advances in the interests of public health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0038038510369368

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These underlying brain phenomena do much to shape, as well as respond to, higher-level romantic experiences across a wide range of theoretical conceptions.

    “Although love is not simply reducible to these brain chemicals or pathways—and although there are many different theories of love, including how it should be defined—what is clear by now is that these underlying phenomena do much to shape (as well as to respond to) our higher-level romantic experiences, across a wide range of theoretical conceptions.”

    From The Medicalization of Love (2015) · cites this paper as [23]

  • Brain chemicals such as oxytocin, dopamine, testosterone, and many others seem to regulate interpersonal drives and emotions, including the formation of romantic pair-bonds.

    “Brain chemicals such as oxytocin, dopamine, testosterone, and many others seem to regulate our interpersonal drives and emotions, including the formation of romantic pair-bonds.”

    From The Medicalization of Love (2015) · cites this paper as [23]

  • Underlying human romantic attachment is a collection of interlocking brain systems hypothesized to have evolved to suit the reproductive needs of our ancestors.

    “Underlying human romantic attachment is a collection of interlocking brain systems that are hypothesized to have evolved to suit the reproductive needs of our ancestors.”

    From The Medicalization of Love (2015) · cites this paper as [23]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abraham, J.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Abraham, John
Venue
Sociology
Published
2010-08
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
603-622
ISSN
  • 0038-0385 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8684
OpenAlex
W2119567800
Cited by
480
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 16
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sociology (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
pharmaceuticalization, medicalization, pharmaceutical industry promotion, pharmaceutical marketing, consumerism, drug regulation, deregulation, therapeutic innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review