Cited by 160Mental Health Treatment and AccessObesity and Health PracticesPsychology and Mental Health

Stigmatizing attitudes of primary care professionals towards people with mental disorders: a systematic review

Open access
Vistorte, Angel O Rojas, Ribeiro, Wagner Silva, Jaen, Denisse, Jorge, Miguel R, Evans-Lacko, Sara, Mari, Jair de Jesus·2018·The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To examine stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental disorders among primary care professionals and to identify potential factors related to stigmatizing attitudes through a systematic review. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Lilacs, IBECS, Index Psicologia, CUMED, MedCarib, Sec. Est. Saúde SP, WHOLIS, Hanseníase, LIS-Localizador de Informação em Saúde, PAHO, CVSO-Regional, and Latindex, through the Virtual Health Library portal ( http://www.bireme.br website) through to June 2017. The articles included in the review were summarized through a narrative synthesis. Results: After applying eligibility criteria, 11 articles, out of 19.109 references identified, were included in the review. Primary care physicians do present stigmatizing attitudes towards patients with mental disorders and show more negative attitudes towards patients with schizophrenia than towards those with depression. Older and more experience doctors have more stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental illness compared with younger and less-experienced doctors. Health-care providers who endorse more stigmatizing attitudes towards mental illness were likely to be more pessimistic about the patient’s adherence to treatment. Conclusions: Stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental disorders are common among physicians in primary care settings, particularly among older and more experienced doctors. Stigmatizing attitudes can act as an important barrier for patients to receive the treatment they need. The primary care physicians feel they need better preparation, training, and information to deal with and to treat mental illness, such as a user friendly and pragmatic classification system that addresses the high prevalence of mental disorders in primary care and community settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0091217418778620

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Jorge M. Concepções populares e estigma relacionados às doenças mentais. Nova Perspectiva Sistêmica. 2013;46:8-19.
  2. Lam TP, Lam KF, Lam EW, Ku YS. Attitudes of primary care physicians towards patients with mental illness in Hong Kong. Asia-Pacific psychiatry : official journal of the Pacific Rim College of Psychiatrists. 2013 Mar;5(1):E19-28. PubMed PMID: 23857792. Epub 2013/07/17. eng.
  3. Rodríguez Fernández E, Espí Martínez F, Canteras Jordana M, Gómez Moraga A. Actitud de los médicos de atención primaria sobre los pacientes con consumo excesivo de alcohol. Atención Primaria. 1999;24(8):447-55.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vistorte, A. O. R., Ribeiro, W. S., Jaen, D., Jorge, M. R., Evans-Lacko, S., & Mari, J. D. J.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
  • Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Vistorte, Angel O Rojas
Venue
The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine
Published
2018-05-28
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
317-338
ISSN
  • 0033-278X (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2174
  • 1541-3527
OpenAlex
W2807137540
Cited by
160
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, FP7/2007)
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Universidade de São Paulo
  • Ministério da Educação
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (337673)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
stigmatizing attitudes, mental illness, primary care physicians, mental health stigma, schizophrenia, depression, physician experience, age differences, medication adherence, barriers to treatment, mental health training
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Mental Disorders, Humans, Primary Health Care, Stereotyping, Needs Assessment, Social Stigma, Physicians, Primary Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review