Cited by 1,121Mental Health Treatment and AccessPrimary Care and Health OutcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Psychiatric Illness in General Practice: A Detailed Study Using a New Method of Case Identification

Open access
Goldberg, D. P., Blackwell, B.·1970·BMJ

Abstract

A self-administered questionary (the General Health Questionnaire) aimed at detecting current psychiatric disturbance was given to 553 consecutive attenders to a general practitioner's surgery. A sample of 200 of these patients was given an independent assessment of their mental state by a psychiatrist using a standardized psychiatric interview. Over 90% of the patients were correctly classified as “well” or “ill” by the questionary, and the correlation between questionary score and the clinical assessment of severity of disturbance was found to be +0·80. The “conspicuous psychiatric morbidity” of a suburban general practice assessed by a general practitioner who was himself a psychiatrist and validated against independent psychiatric assessment was found to be 20%. “Hidden psychiatric morbidity” was found to account for one-third of all disturbed patients. These patients were similar to patients with “conspicuous illnesses” in terms both of degree of disturbance and the course of their illnesses at six-month follow-up, but were distinguished by their attitude to their illness and by usually presenting a physical symptom to the general practitioner. When 87 patients who had been assessed as psychiatric cases at the index consultation were called back for follow-up six months later, two-thirds of them were functioning in the normal range. Frequency of attendance at the surgery in the six months following index consultation was found to have only a modest relationship to severity of psychiatric disturbance. It is argued that minor affective illnesses and physical complaints often accompany each other and usually have a good prognosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.2.5707.439

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Goldberg, D. P. (1969). The Assessment of the Severity of Non- Psychotic Psychiatric Illness by Means of a Questionnaire, Un- published D. M. Thesis, Oxford University.
  2. Jones, A. D. (1962). Mental Disorder in Anglesey, Unpublished M.D. Thesis, Liverpool University.
  3. Kiloh, L. G., and Garside, R. F. (1963). British Journal of Psychiatry, 109, 451.
  4. Kreitman, N. (1961). Journal of Mental Science, 107, 876.
  5. Remein, Q. R., and Wilkerson, H. L. C. (1961). Journal of Chronic Diseases, 13. 6.
  6. Taylor, S. J. L. (1954). Good General Practice. London, Oxford Uni- versity Press.
  7. Yerushalmy, J. (1953). Diseases of the Chest, 24, 133. on 12 July 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://www.bmj.com/ Br Med J: first published as 10.1136/bmj.2.5707.439 on 23 May 1970. Downloaded from

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldberg, D. P., & Blackwell, B.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1970-05-23
Volume
2
Issue
5707
Pages
439-443
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2054517429
Cited by
1,121
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 25
FWCI
25.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
London School of Economics and Political Science
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
psychiatric morbidity, general practice, General Health Questionnaire, case finding, psychiatric disturbances, somatic symptoms, prognosis, follow-up, primary care mental health
MeSH terms
Adjustment Disorders, Mental Disorders, Depression, Family Practice, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Neurotic Disorders, Personality Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review