The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of the Experiences of Humility Scale
Abstract
In three studies, we developed the Experiences of Humility Scale (EHS). In Study 1, we used exploratory factor analysis to determine the factor structure and to reduce items in a sample of undergraduates (N = 200). The EHS had four subscales: Other-orientation, Transcendence, Awareness of Selfishness, and Awareness of Egotism. Study 2 involved an experiment with a second sample of college students (N = 106) that provided initial evidence of construct validity. Participants assigned to a Meaning Condition (i.e., writing about a most meaningful event) reported lower levels of awareness of egotism and selfishness than did participants assigned to a Neutral Condition. In Study 3, with a third sample of college students (N = 155), we replicated the factor structure of the EHS using confirmatory factor analysis and evaluated additional evidence of construct validity. As predicted, the EHS subscales predicted constructs associated with spiritual connection and meaning. Likewise, providing evidence of discriminant validity, the EHS subscales were only moderately related to traits of humility, agreeableness, and neuroticism.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nonetheless, Davis et al. (2017) developed the Experience of Humility Scale (EHS), in which they identified four subscales to measure humility: other orientation, transcendence, awareness of selfishness, and awareness of egotism.”
From Humility and Servant-Leadership: Toward a Solution of Pastoral Narcissism (2024) · cites this paper as Davis et al., 2017
Citations
Cites
The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life
Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80 · Cited by 4,843
Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8 · Cited by 1,961 · cited 2×
“Research on humility has increased in recent years, and this growing interest has led to a proliferation of various measures of humility (for reviews, see Davis & Hook, 2014; Davis, Worthington, & Hook, 2010), including self-report measures (e.g., HEXICO-PI; Lee & Ashton, 2004) as well as other alternatives such as in…”
MethodFunk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572 · Cited by 1,806 · cited 1×
“Partial correlations among items on each subscale were examined after controlling for the total score on that subscale (Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
MethodWho knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model.
Vazire, S. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017908 · Cited by 1,080
Why Don’t We Practice What We Preach? A Meta-Analytic Review of Religious Racism
Hall, D. L., Matz, D. C., & Wood, W. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309352179 · Cited by 431
Others Sometimes Know Us Better Than We Know Ourselves
Vazire, S., & Carlson, E. N. (2011) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721411402478 · Cited by 286
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Baumeister R. F., 1991, Meanings in life.
- Baumeister R. F., 2002, Handbook of Positive Psychology, 608
- 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00089.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.09.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/spc3.12069 · DOI
- Costa P. T., 1992, Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) Professional Manual.
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02150.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0003-066X.54.10.821 · DOI
- 10.1177/009164711404200112 · DOI
- 10.1080/17439761003791672 · DOI
- 10.1080/00223891.2011.558871 · DOI
- 10.1177/009164711003800202 · DOI
- 10.1080/15298868.2011.636509 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.400 · DOI
- 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/17439760.2013.844267 · DOI
- 10.1080/13674670601035510 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.652 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/10478400701598330 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0014672 · DOI
- 10.1177/009164711404200108 · DOI
- 10.1080/17439760.2013.820337 · DOI
- 10.1080/13674676.2010.489390 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_3 · DOI
- 10.1080/17439760.2011.626787 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00429.x · DOI
- 10.1177/009164711404200111 · DOI
- Moradi A., 2013, International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 5, 829
- Muthén L. K., 1998, Mplus user's guide (7th ed.).
- 10.1111/1467-6494.00080 · DOI
- Powers C., 2007, Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 18, 75
- 10.1080/17439760600885671 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0029393 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/15228878.2011.561702 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00060.x · DOI
- Suchet M., 2007, Relational psychoanalysis, Vol. 3: New Voices.
- Twenge J. M., 2006, Generation Me: Why today's young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled—And more miserable than ever before.
- 10.1080/17439760.2014.898317 · DOI
- 10.1177/1948550614541298 · DOI
- 10.1177/009164711404200107 · DOI
- Van Tongeren D. R., Journal of Positive Psychology.
- 10.1037/0022-0167.50.1.84 · DOI
- 10.1177/1088868313497266 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Humility and Servant-Leadership: Toward a Solution of Pastoral Narcissism
Bryant, L. W. R. (2024) · International Journal of Servant-Leadership · doi:10.33972/ijsl.417
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, D. E., McElroy, S., Choe, E., Westbrook, C. J., DeBlaere, C., Van Tongeren, D. R., Hook, J., Sandage, S. J., & Placeres, V.
- Affiliations
- Georgia State University
- Hope College
- University of North Texas
- Boston University
- Venue
- Journal of Psychology and Theology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-16
- ISSN
- 0091-6471
- 2328-1162
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of the Experiences of Humility Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/009164711704500101
- The paper
- Davis, D. E., McElroy, S., Choe, E., Westbrook, C. J., DeBlaere, C., Van Tongeren, D. R., Hook, J., Sandage, S. J., & Placeres, V. (2017). Development of the Experiences of Humility Scale. Journal of Psychology and Theology. https://doi.org/10.1177/009164711704500101