Cited by 22Forgiveness and Related BehaviorsEmotions and Moral BehaviorSocial and Intergroup Psychology

An Intellectually Humbling Experience: Changes in Interpersonal Perception and Cultural Reasoning across a Five-Week Course

Meagher, Benjamin R., Gunn, Hanna, Sheff, Nathan, Van Tongeren, Daryl R.·2019·Journal of Psychology and Theology

Abstract

Finding ways to foster intellectual humility (IH)—the willingness to own one’s limitations—is an important goal for facilitating effective learning. We report the results of a longitudinal, quasi-experimental study, conducted across six undergraduate, culturally diverse (58% racial/ethnic minority) introductory philosophy courses, that evaluates how social perceptions and cross-cultural reasoning change following a course on epistemology and social ethics. Critically, we manipulated whether each class received a standardized lesson in IH at the start of the course or not. Participants provided self-ratings of IH, gave round-robin judgments of their classmates, and completed a wise-reasoning writing exercise focusing on a cultural conflict at both the beginning and end of the summer course session. Results revealed no change in self-reported IH, but an increase in perceived peer IH and conscientiousness within classes where IH was taught. Moreover, an analysis of the participants’ writing suggested greater levels of compromise-seeking when dealing with a cultural conflict among the students taught about IH, relative to those in the control classes. This study provides initial insights regarding the relationship between IH and cultural humility, as well as the efficacy of facilitating the development of IH among undergraduate students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0091647119837010

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a quasi-experimental study, students who received a lesson on intellectual humility showed greater levels of compromise-seeking in conflicts and were perceived by peers as having higher intellectual humility than controls, but the lesson did not increase self-reported intellectual humility.

    “At the end of the course, students who received the lesson showed greater levels of compromise- seeking in conflicts and were perceived by their peers as having higher intellectual humility than those in a control group. However, the lesson did not increase self- reported intellectual humility 126 .”

    From Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility (2022) · cites this paper as [126]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meagher, B. R., Gunn, H., Sheff, N., & Van Tongeren, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Hope College (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Hope College, USA
Corresponding author
Meagher, Benjamin R.
Venue
Journal of Psychology and Theology
Published
2019-04-01
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
217-229
ISSN
  • 0091-6471 (ISSN-L)
  • 2328-1162
OpenAlex
W2931654871
Cited by
22
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Psychology and Theology (publishedVersion)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
intellectual humility, cultural humility, interpersonal perception, cultural reasoning, wisdom, cultural conflict, conscientiousness, culturally diverse students, racial and ethnic minorities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review